STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
Membership by invitation only
STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
3,037
IN-GAME
26,986
ONLINE
Founded
7 August, 2011
Language
English
tohico 15 Oct, 2013 @ 2:44am
Accusation of relisting – where do we stand on then?
Hello everyone,

let me introduce myself. My name is tohico. You might have seen me around already :>. I trade a lot. Like a lot a lot. I depend on Steam trading since I pay my college bills from this. So believe or not, but I know a little bit about trading... I’ve been operating on tf2op over 1.5 year and I always stick to the rules, so this took me off guard quite bad.

Several of my trades have been close for being a relist. I understand a relist as offering the same item in several trades to make a spam when someone is searching for an item. That right, isn’t it? I’ve never done that. I just put my whole offer in the description, which doesn’t cause the spam that’d hurt the competition. Why? Because people don’t use full-text search, the search itself is based on the items advertised in the trade.

There’re two types of trades that has been closed:

Selling sets:

I’m trying to sell sets. I made trades that show I’m selling whole sets only, not just individual trades. That’s why this requires to have opened more than one trade. And honestly, 80% of those customers aren’t buying only the advertised set, they usually buy more sets at once. That’s why there’s my whole list of sets on stock in each of the trade. I don’t see any other way I could be able to sell my sets. Am I supposed to open 50 trades with each of the set? And then close it again when I run out of stock? Or how am I going to redirect people to the whole list of sets when nobody reads descriptions nowadays?

Le example:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14132535
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13940798

Games offers:

This isn’t that essential, but it hurts me a bit. So what’s apparently wrong with it? Since my list of games isn’t that large, I put whole offer into my description. People often want to see my whole list, so they usually pick other games from there as well. This way of description might be a little bit confusing for customers. That’s why that many people aren’t using it. But I have solved it by the yellow marks that show the games that the trade is based on. Win-win situation by my opinion, customer finds it easily and it doesn’t hurt the competition.

Examples again:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14281563
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14281624

So could I get any explanation for that, please? Why it’s suddenly so wrong? It sure doesn't hurt anyone. I'm opened for a discussion. And any tips how it should be done then?!? Especially when this way is essential for certain kind of trades. And there’re nice ways for the games, but it’s on the edge in one part as well. The typical mother trade + minion trades that redirect back to mom = the mom is basically a relist then too. So this would be wrong as well? I’d really love to hear that.

One would guess that you’d be thinking twice before doing questionable actions since tf2op has changed to the subscription way of payments. Regular paying customers need better customer service, it's not an one-time deal anymore.

Thanks for making my life a little bit harder. Hopefully it will make stronger …or it'll take me down :hmm:
Last edited by tohico; 15 Oct, 2013 @ 12:48pm
< >
Showing 1-12 of 12 comments
para 15 Oct, 2013 @ 6:26am 
It's because you created a list with all the items, so you don't need to have two trades open. If I was to create 3 trades with 24 items from my backpack and then add a note on all the trades saying: "Selling my whole backpack" then that would be classified as relisting as well, since I have no need to have 3 trades open for the same purpose.
tohico 15 Oct, 2013 @ 11:00am 
@l8ter allig8ter: What's wrong with that? If you're going to sell ir piece by piece, you have to create more than one trade anyway. Otherwise nobody would find you're selling those items, only 8 of them. The description management is only up to you.

So could I get any response from someone in charge? Several of my trades are stopped because of this and I don't know what to do now. I need to be back as soon as possible.
Originally posted by tohico:
Several of my trades have been close for being a relist. I understand a relist as offering the same item in several trades to make a spam when someone is searching for an item. That right, isn’t it? I’ve never done that. I just put my whole offer in the description, which doesn’t cause the spam that’d hurt the competition. Why? Because people don’t use full-text search, the search itself is based on the items advertised in the trade.

I've added the bold style.

That's where the problem lies. Quoting the current relist rule:

No relists. Relisting is creating multiple trades for the same purpose or listing the same item in multiple trades excessively. You cannot have multiple trades open with the same goal, and you cannot have an excessive number of trades open for the same item.

Again added the bold style.

Your closed trades had the same purpose: sell all the items listed in the trade notes. And this was even more clear considering you copy/pasted the same text on all of them.

Am I supposed to open 50 trades with each of the set? And then close it again when I run out of stock? Or how am I going to redirect people to the whole list of sets when nobody reads descriptions nowadays?

Yes, you are supposed to open a different trade for each set or use 1 big trade to sell all of them. You can't have both. It's not our fault people don't read, sorry.

So what’s apparently wrong with it? Since my list of games isn’t that large, I put whole offer into my description. People often want to see my whole list, so they usually pick other games from there as well. This way of description might be a little bit confusing for customers. That’s why that many people aren’t using it. But I have solved it by the yellow marks that show the games that the trade is based on. Win-win situation by my opinion, customer finds it easily and it doesn’t hurt the competition.

This has been addressed in the beginning of the post.

So could I get any explanation for that, please? Why it’s suddenly so wrong? It sure doesn't hurt anyone. I'm opened for a discussion. And any tips how it should be done then?!? Especially when this way is essential for certain kind of trades.

It is not "suddenly so wrong". It has always been wrong. People just don't report them enough.

You should either 1) use one trade for each set of cards/games, or 2) use a big trade to advertise all your games/cards.

One would guess that you’d be thinking twice before doing questionable actions since tf2op has changed to the subscription way of payments. Regular paying customers need better customer service, it's not an one-time deal anymore.

The action taken was not questionable according to the relist rule, as explained above.

Thanks for making my life a little bit harder. Hopefully it will make stronger …or it'll take me down :hmm:

All of your trades were reported by a guy who had his own trades closed for the exact same reason. He used the "everyone does it" excuse, and I said report the trades and we will take care of them. Unfortunately to you they were your trades, but to the staff it really doesn't matter who they belong to as we don't pick/differentiate users.
Last edited by Blue Screen of Death; 15 Oct, 2013 @ 11:48pm
TF2OP need more than 8 items in trade
"No relists. Relisting is creating multiple trades for the same purpose or listing the same item in multiple trades excessively. You cannot have multiple trades open with the same goal, and you cannot have an excessive number of trades open for the same item."

" Relisting is creating multiple trades for the same purpose"....."You cannot have multiple trades open with the same goal"

So if you have multiple trades with the purpose of gaining metal then you are guilty of relisting, even if the items are completely different. For example 2 trades covering 16 different hats for the purpose of gaining metal would be considered relisting according to the above definition. The author separates the "purpose" of the trade gaining meta/keys or cashing out from listing the same item multiple times. By definition, having more than one trade open with different items for metal/keys or cashing out makes you guilty of relisting. I would guess 99.9% of users are then guilty of said crime rendering the definition a moot point. The definition should be redefined in order to eschew obfuscation and become clear and concise.

We don't go around randomly checking and policing peoples' trades. It needs to be reported and unusually when it is, it is because it is excessive. By excessive I mean putting a trade with a bunch of items and then putting an individual, separate trade with every single item in that original trade. It's unnecessary and it clutters up search results for all the other users. Hopefully this clears up a bit of the confusion! =)
tohico 16 Oct, 2013 @ 9:55am 
All right, thank you for all your replies. This clears it up a little bit, but I still have more questions :3

Q1: Is it okay to post a trade with whole offer (repeatedly), if I clearly state the price before the whole list? (I see this alternative quite often.)

Q2: Is it allowed to make small individual trades with 8 items per trade (previously called minions) that'd be also linking to the one big trade with the whole offer (previously and further called mom)? (This is very essential and very commonly used. You can take as an example the way I’m buying cards – do not close it if it’s wrong! I’ll manage it myself.)

Q2b: If it’s okay, what do I do if I ran out of stock of item that’s in the head of the mom’s trade? Is it all right if I leave the item in heading as available? (That’s how it’s commonly done on those kinds of trades since we’re not able to reopen the availability of those items and reopening such trade would mean losing all bookmarks.)

Q2c: If the Q2 way isn’t okay, is it all right if I do it like this, when the items of interest don’t repeat? For example: Minion advertises item A and B and it also mentions the mom. But the mom has the list of items only for item C and D. Is this all right? (It’s way much less efficient and it’s just confusing, but it should be fine according to rules and this discussion.)

Q3: Am I allowed to make trades like “selling all my items from page 2 for 1.00 ref” and then making 3 trades with all 24 different items from my inventory, but with the same description – price is 1.00 ref each, also selling all items from page 2 at this price. Is it allowed? (Basically what’s considered as the purpose of the trade here. Selling all my items from page 2 or selling each item listed above for 1.00 ref?)

Q4: Am I allowed to link to my whole offer that's listed on a third-party site? (Typically Google Docs or Pastebin, it’s very commonly used and essential, esp. if Q2 isn’t allowed. But it conflicts with the rule #1 - Links to third-party websites, apart from relevant YouTube or image hosting websites.)

Q5: If I see a relist, or the so-called relist, am I supposed to report all the relists or only one of them?

Q6: If I see the so-called relist, am I allowed to post in the trade saying this way is considered as conflicting with the rules? Or is it considered as spam and I should just report them? And what if the trader, that I’m giving the heads up to, reports me for spamming in his marvelous trade?

It is not "suddenly so wrong". It has always been wrong. People just don't report them enough.
I still see it that way. I use this way of listing my whole offer in trades (and then marking up the items in the head of the trade) over 6 months and I had never had problem with it. It’s even very commonly used. If it naturally grows on the market and it’s not restricted while growing, this ways should be allowed. We’re just trying to make our offers more efficient since we’re limited by the way the tf2op works.
Last edited by tohico; 16 Oct, 2013 @ 3:33pm
Brick Top 16 Oct, 2013 @ 11:01am 
Same problem here:

This trade got closed for being a relist: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15053791

The other trade open with the same unusual is: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15054140

The purpose of both trades, as you can see, is completely different. If relisting the same item in two trades with completely different purposes is not allowed, please tell me, but I have seen everyone and his brother do it. Specially on trades for unusual offers/cash offers on the same item, trades with a lot of unusuals and all the same in one trade, or even on my own trades:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15053750
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15053742

I already lost my comments from my previous trade which stated how amazing it was and some other compliments/offers, and it's a pain to write new notes every single time. Added for discussion, or just to let me know if I really can't open it again.

Cheers!
Originally posted by tohico:
Q1: Is it okay to post a trade with whole offer (repeatedly), if I clearly state the price before the whole list? (I see this alternative quite often.)

You can't make offers for the same items over multiple trades.

Originally posted by tohico:
Q2: Is it allowed to make small individual trades with 8 items per trade (previously called minions) that'd be also linking to the one big trade with the whole offer (previously and further called mom)? (This is very essential and very commonly used. You can take as an example the way I’m buying cards – do not close it if it’s wrong! I’ll manage it myself.)

No. You can't have the same items listed in more than one trade. Either keep a bunch of minions or one big trade.

Originally posted by tohico:
Q2b: If it’s okay, what do I do if I ran out of stock of item that’s in the head of the mom’s trade? Is it all right if I leave the item in heading as available? (That’s how it’s commonly done on those kinds of trades since we’re not able to reopen the availability of those items and reopening such trade would mean losing all bookmarks.)

If a trade runs out of stock or goes temporarily inactive all the user needs to do is disable autobumping. The trades don't need to be closed on these circumstances.

Originally posted by tohico:
Q2c: If the Q2 way isn’t okay, is it all right if I do it like this, when the items of interest don’t repeat? For example: Minion advertises item A and B and it also mentions the mom. But the mom has the list of items only for item C and D. Is this all right? (It’s way much less efficient and it’s just confusing, but it should be fine according to rules and this discussion.)

Yes, you can link to your other trades if you want, as long as they don't advertise the same items.

Originally posted by tohico:
Q3: Am I allowed to make trades like “selling all my items from page 2 for 1.00 ref” and then making 3 trades with all 24 different items from my inventory, but with the same description – price is 1.00 ref each, also selling all items from page 2 at this price. Is it allowed? (Basically what’s considered as the purpose of the trade here. Selling all my items from page 2 or selling each item listed above for 1.00 ref?)

No, because your goal here is to sell the items from page 2, not only the 8 items. The latter are only "included" in the whole pack - your main goal is to sell all of page 2.

Originally posted by tohico:
Q4: Am I allowed to link to my whole offer that's listed on a third-party site? (Typically Google Docs or Pastebin, it’s very commonly used and essential, esp. if Q2 isn’t allowed. But it conflicts with the rule #1 - Links to third-party websites, apart from relevant YouTube or image hosting websites.)

If a link is related to the trade it is usually allowed, unless it's made for advertisement/profit purposes (e.g.: a link to a page with ads).

Originally posted by tohico:
Q5: If I see a relist, or the so-called relist, am I supposed to report all the relists or only one of them?

Only one of them. We check the user's trade list and close all the relists even if they were not reported. It also helps us because it doesn't clog the report queue this way.

Originally posted by tohico:
Q6: If I see the so-called relist, am I allowed to post in the trade saying this way is considered as conflicting with the rules? Or is it considered as spam and I should just report them? And what if the trader, that I’m giving the heads up to, reports me for spamming in his marvelous trade?

It is recommended not to, reporting them is enough. Doing so could also generate problems with the trade owner that could easily be avoided.

Originally posted by tohico:
It is not "suddenly so wrong". It has always been wrong. People just don't report them enough.
I still see it that way. I use this way of listing my whole offer in trades (and then marking up the items in the head of the trade) over 6 months and I had never had problem with it. It’s even very commonly used. If it naturally grows on the market and it’s not restricted while growing, this ways should be allowed. We’re just trying to make our offers more efficient since we’re limited by the way the tf2op works.
[/quote]

Probably because the trades were not reported until now, or they slip passed us - we are not infallible. The site has a huge user/staff proportion, and a good share of offenses are never reported. We do our best to enforce the rules. It's not because something grew in popularity that it should be allowed, e.g. insulting.

Most people simply want to push the boundaries as far as possible, and they usually do what they see other people do it instead of reading the rules or asking the staff like you just did. It's perfectly possible to sell 1000 games with only 280 slots, all you need is 1 trade with a generic trade icon and a full list in the description. But since there are so many illegal trades bumping every second it makes it hard to have good exposure. The solution is not to join the illegal hype, but dismantle it instead.
Last edited by Blue Screen of Death; 17 Oct, 2013 @ 2:38am
DJCaseyD 17 Oct, 2013 @ 4:37pm 
Originally posted by Hipster:
TF2OP need more than 8 items in trade

This. If you're trying to sell a lot of weapons, there is no way to do it within the guildelines other than hope that someone will actually go inside your backpack and look around for what it is they're searching for. If I have 40 random weapons to sell, I still don't understand why 5 trades with those 40 items spread out is a problem.

On another note, why is it that people get banned for this and yet there are a huge amount of posts with people having a picture of 1 key, 1 ref and then the inside of their post listing 1.5 keys as the price? Clearly false advertising and a waste of time, and against the rules and yet it happens constantly. There isn't enough time in the day to report all of them.
Last edited by DJCaseyD; 17 Oct, 2013 @ 4:42pm
tohico 17 Oct, 2013 @ 5:56pm 
Thank you, Blue Screen of Dea†h, for the explanation. It clears everything up and I know where the line is now. I’ll just have to focus on putting the lists outside of the tf2op from now on. I see this as the most efficient solution that’ll solve this problem completely. Just keep in mind that those lists were beneficial for tf2op as well since we were sending our customers there ;-)

Originally posted by tRYSIS3:
what if the big trade doesnt mention the minions or list them ? each trade would have its own items.
that wouldn't be relisting since each item is only listed once! ,minions can put up a link to the big trade tho!!

This is covered by the question Q2c I asked. You can use this way as long as you don’t relist anything in the trade’s heading nor the description, plus as long as it’s not considered as the same purpose of those trades. (I’d avoid generalizing the trade, try to be specific as much as possible.)

Originally posted by DJCaseyD:
Originally posted by Hipster:
TF2OP need more than 8 items in trade
This. If you're trying to sell a lot of weapons, there is no way to do it within the guildelines other than hope that someone will actually go inside your backpack and look around for what it is they're searching for. If I have 40 random weapons to sell, I still don't understand why 5 trades with those 40 items spread out is a problem.

The 8 slots concept keeps it all nice and clean. It has certain limitations, but I like it. It makes tf2op what it is, I doubt this is ever going to change. Although it’s odd that it’s against the rules to sell items like you were doing (same as in the question Q3), the 8 slots concept naturally forces you to do it like this.

Originally posted by DJCaseyD:
On another note, why is it that people get banned for this and yet there are a huge amount of posts with people having a picture of 1 key, 1 ref and then the inside of their post listing 1.5 keys as the price? Clearly false advertising and a waste of time, and against the rules and yet it happens constantly. There isn't enough time in the day to report all of them.

Using 1 key and 1 ref generally means the type of currency the seller is accepting, it’s very common on trades when you’re selling items with different prices. In rare cases, it’s also used on one item trades if seller intends changing the price in future (typically on long-term trades).
Last edited by tohico; 17 Oct, 2013 @ 6:02pm
Originally posted by DJCaseyD:
On another note, why is it that people get banned for this and yet there are a huge amount of posts with people having a picture of 1 key, 1 ref and then the inside of their post listing 1.5 keys as the price? Clearly false advertising and a waste of time, and against the rules and yet it happens constantly. There isn't enough time in the day to report all of them.

Due to some site limitations (inability to un-delete items and # of slots), it's generally acceptable to use 1 key/ref/bud as a placeholder for x keys/ref/buds. Some items' prices fluctuate a lot and therefore making use of a placeholder is a good solution to keep a trade open in case the buy/sell price changes.

The problem occurs when the item's price is too close to the placeholder value - it could be interpreted as misleading.
Last edited by Blue Screen of Death; 18 Oct, 2013 @ 3:29pm
< >
Showing 1-12 of 12 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: 15 Oct, 2013 @ 2:44am
Posts: 12