STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
Membership by invitation only
STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
3,652
IN-GAME
28,768
ONLINE
Founded
7 August, 2011
Language
English
[Mature] R34/Explicit materials on Consientious objectors/decalable items
TF2 Outpost's group description (excerpt): All of the rules on the website apply here too, so spamming or insulting other users will result in a ban from the group, and if the incident is serious enough may result in a ban on the website.




inb4 perm or temp ban from the group and/or the site from staff .-.


Well ladies and (for the most part) gentlemen, nearly three weeks ago, I was banned from Outpost for one day. Just a simple temp-ban for violating the non-existent rules. Their reasons behind the temp-ban? This trade: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14783675. The trade violated non of Outpost's rules in any way. It was a legitimate trade, the items advertised were being sold, I wasn't building weps to an unusual, I had not commented on the prices of items, I had not hijacked a trade, I had not posted a phishing link, etc... So why then was it closed? Because Garry *insert generic insult here*.

So in a nutshell, I was banned (temporarily) for violating NONE of Outpost's rules about trading.

That sure doesn't sound corrupt in any way! Nope. Not at all.


First, let me show you some of the market for explicit objectors (there's much more I've seen but most trades are either closed by staff or are sold quickly and quietly in order to avoid bans; this is all I could scoop together in the amount of time I spent researching this):
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14808628 (sold all)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14693801 (sold for 10 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14543686 (sold all for idk how much) ZEMN APPROVED :O
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14308513 (sold all for 12 ref in items)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14281538 (sold all for 10 ref in hats)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13911192 (sold all for 1.8 keys in items)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14303955 (sold for 1 ref)
In the past I remember seeing a user who was specifically buying objectors with pictures of his favorite pornstar on them (closed, assumedly by staff)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15012154 (seems to have accepted 2.66 on his objector)
On the above trade, someone said that they had had their trade closed for having explicit material on his objector as well.


These trades show some of the market that explicit objectors have, and TF2 Outpost, a website used for marketing items and assistance in trading, would sound as though these would be allowed as they have a market.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, back to Garry (the mod who temp banned me... yea, him)

I later added Garry and talked to him about this issue. He basically stated that it was:
1. Against OP's rules
2. Younger users/kids use this site
3. It's common sense not to post explicit content onto a site in any way
4. Against the Steam Subscriber Agreement
5. Can get your Steam account banned, so why do it at all

Let's prove all of those points false shall we?

1. Easy. OP has no rules concerning younger audiences or explicit material

2. I understand that younger children use this site, but that means younger children are playing/are exposed to a game with blood, killing, and all kinds of users of varying ages who say and do questionable/explicit things such as cuss and spray mature content in-game. LONG STORY SHORT: It's the internet, look away and live on with your life (even though I do understand his concern about this one)
Well, if OP is so kid-friendly, why are things like this not closed (inb4 two trades =/= every trade)?
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14972664
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14762028 (not explicit as in "17+", but it's a guy giving you the finger... that's DEFINITELY younger-user-appropriate..)

3. It's also common sense in TF2 trading to make profit off of sales and to have objective progress.

4. Against the ToS eh? I think not. I've read over the ToS three times now, and this is the closest thing to explicit material in the rules:
----------4. ONLINE CONDUCT, CHEATING AND ILLEGAL BEHAVIOR

----------You agree that you will be personally responsible for the use of your Account and for all of the communication and activity on Steam that results from use of your Account. Your online conduct and interaction with other Subscribers should be guided by common sense and basic etiquette. Specific requirements may also be found in the Steam Online Conduct rules at http://steampowered.com/index.php?area=online_conduct, other Rules of Use, the Subscription Terms, or in terms of use imposed by third parties who host particular games or other services.

The above states that, in a nutshell, speific terms to mateials' validity applies differently to games and, more specifially, to server hosters (like Skial, Lotus, Pheonix, Sodahappy, to name a few off the top of my head, who have specific server rules as to content that cannot be displayed). And, as far as TF2's perspective on explicit materials posted onto objectors:

http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/3/33/TF2decalToS.jpg?t=20111019024046
The item has potential to be removed if it is offensive or if it violates (directly) the ToS by (indirectly) violating servers' rules.

5. As stated (indirectly) in the above point, your account will not be banned, and at worst, the item will be removed from existence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14887240
Finally, is this allowed without having the trade closed? If this is the case, those of us with explicit material'd objectors can set up our trades in a sort of "child-friendly" way so that younger users do not see our products while allowing those interested to buy/sell via Outpost.




What I WOULD LIKE and HIGHLY APPRECIATE is for some reasonable compromise to be reached with Outpost and those of us who do these types of things so that our trades can remain open without offending anyone and etc...


inb4 TL;DR
inb4 anti-bronies
inb4 people who are biased
inb4 people who are stubbornly passionate about whatever side they choose
inb4 Garry banning me
inb4 Blue Screen banning me as well
inb4 Zemn laughing
inb4 using as BP.TF proof
inb4 staff closing this without giving any consideration to anything
inb4 cc. Tyc oon facepalming
inb4 Gaben smiting me dead with lightning for posting this



Zemn-approved :rainbow:
Last edited by Rain | READ PROFILE; 21 Oct, 2013 @ 5:03pm
< >
Showing 1-8 of 8 comments
para 21 Oct, 2013 @ 5:21pm 
Well, on the bottom of the rules page it says: "Note: Most rules are common sense and it would therefore be impossible to list all the things you could do to get yourself banned. This page is not acting as a complete list of bannable offenses — it instead aims to clear up some confusion about those rules that may not be obvious. All moderators and admins have the power to close trades as they see fit (with reason, of course)."
And I sort of provided proof against any possible reasons that they could have for closing such trades. Also, a simple workaround would be nice to negotiate.
Currier Bell 21 Oct, 2013 @ 6:08pm 
I don't think it has to be stated that no pornography has to fall under common sense. If you believe that it isn't then that is up to you. However we believe that many users find it that way.

Either way you now know the rules. Don't post objectors with that content again. Simple as that.
Originally posted by Currier Bell:
I don't think it has to be stated that no pornography has to fall under common sense. If you believe that it isn't then that is up to you. However we believe that many users find it that way.

Either way you now know the rules. Don't post objectors with that content again. Simple as that.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14887240
Finally, is this allowed without having the trade closed? If this is the case, those of us with explicit material'd objectors can set up our trades in a sort of "child-friendly" way so that younger users do not see our products while allowing those interested to buy/sell via Outpost.

zemnmez 21 Oct, 2013 @ 7:21pm 
I'm not really sure about my "approval" of your actions - I said that though I could personally tolerate the contents of your trades, that that position was not held by the majority of users of the site and that without a system (that will never be put in place) that could control the exposure of explicit content, the objectors could never be allowed on site.

Perhaps I wasn't clear enough: explicit objectors are not allowed on site, and if they are reported, they will be closed and the owners of the trades given appropriate bans.

At the end of the day it's a case of victimless crime, but in some ways you also should have known better.
Last edited by zemnmez; 21 Oct, 2013 @ 8:13pm
Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
Well ladies and (for the most part) gentlemen, nearly three weeks ago, I was banned from Outpost for one day. Just a simple temp-ban for violating the non-existent rules. Their reasons behind the temp-ban? This trade: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14783675. The trade violated non of Outpost's rules in any way. It was a legitimate trade, the items advertised were being sold, I wasn't building weps to an unusual, I had not commented on the prices of items, I had not hijacked a trade, I had not posted a phishing link, etc... So why then was it closed? Because Garry *insert generic insult here*.

So, that's how you start your argument? Using expressions like "insert generic insult here"? That's why you quoted the forum rules above? Trying to push it into a ban here too?

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
So in a nutshell, I was banned (temporarily) for violating NONE of Outpost's rules about trading.

Quoting from the rules page:

Most rules are common sense and it would therefore be impossible to list all the things you could do to get yourself banned. This page is not acting as a complete list of bannable offenses — it instead aims to clear up some confusion about those rules that may not be obvious. All moderators and admins have the power to close trades as they see fit (with reason, of course).

It's impossible for us to list all possible offenses. That's why there's this common sense note. It is considered common sense in any professional/public environment to censor/forbid NSFW content, as well as racism or any other public known inappropriate behaviors. But oh! This is the internet! Yes, this is the internet, but TF2OP is a privately owned site with its own set of rules and administrators, who decide and judge what/how things should be done. This is no different in many many other places.

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
That sure doesn't sound corrupt in any way! Nope. Not at all.

Inappropriate, really. You are upset just because it happened to you.


Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
First, let me show you some of the market for explicit objectors (there's much more I've seen but most trades are either closed by staff or are sold quickly and quietly in order to avoid bans; this is all I could scoop together in the amount of time I spent researching this):
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14808628 (sold all)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14693801 (sold for 10 ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14543686 (sold all for idk how much) ZEMN APPROVED :O
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14308513 (sold all for 12 ref in items)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14281538 (sold all for 10 ref in hats)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13911192 (sold all for 1.8 keys in items)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14303955 (sold for 1 ref)
In the past I remember seeing a user who was specifically buying objectors with pictures of his favorite pornstar on them (closed, assumedly by staff)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15012154 (seems to have accepted 2.66 on his objector)
On the above trade, someone said that they had had their trade closed for having explicit material on his objector as well.

7 of trades were created by the same user. This results in 2 offending users total from the sample you provided. And the creator of those 7 trades was also banned for the exact same offense. Therefore, he didn't slip by the system, he was punished for the same thing you did. And the other probably didn't get the punishment because noone reported him yet, and I will take care of this after I finish this post.

Thousands of trades are created every single day, we simply can't monitor every single one. That's why we have the report system - for users to help us make TF2OP a better place by reporting the bad trade(r)s so we can remove them from the site. An open offending trade doesn't mean that we are "ok" with its status, it could mean 1) nobody reported it, or 2) we didn't get to it yet.

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
These trades show some of the market that explicit objectors have, and TF2 Outpost, a website used for marketing items and assistance in trading, would sound as though these would be allowed as they have a market.

This argument gives everyone the freedom to sell whatever they want for whatever they want. Would you like to see a humiliating image of someone you care being displayed as a decal and sold too? There are no explicit rules against this either. And also no explicit rules against racism, drugs, crime, etc.

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
1. Easy. OP has no rules concerning younger audiences or explicit material

Already explained.

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
2. I understand that younger children use this site, but that means younger children are playing/are exposed to a game with blood, killing, and all kinds of users of varying ages who say and do questionable/explicit things such as cuss and spray mature content in-game. LONG STORY SHORT: It's the internet, look away and live on with your life (even though I do understand his concern about this one)
Well, if OP is so kid-friendly, why are things like this not closed (inb4 two trades =/= every trade)?
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14972664
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14762028 (not explicit as in "17+", but it's a guy giving you the finger... that's DEFINITELY younger-user-appropriate..)

Already explained.

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
3. It's also common sense in TF2 trading to make profit off of sales and to have objective progress.

Already explained.

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
4. Against the ToS eh? I think not. I've read over the ToS three times now, and this is the closest thing to explicit material in the rules:

http://steampowered.com/index.php?area=online_conduct states:

  • Restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying Steam services, software or other content.

I believe this is enough to consider these inappropriate under Steam terms. But that's not necessary, as it is already considered inappropriate under our terms.

Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14887240
Finally, is this allowed without having the trade closed? If this is the case, those of us with explicit material'd objectors can set up our trades in a sort of "child-friendly" way so that younger users do not see our products while allowing those interested to buy/sell via Outpost.

This is something we will discuss, as it could be seem both as a good and a bad thing. We can't forbid people to own specific items, and if they do own they will be visible in their backpacks anytime (having a trade pointing to it or not).


Originally posted by Smoothly-Running Applesauce:
inb4 TL;DR
inb4 anti-bronies
inb4 people who are biased
inb4 people who are stubbornly passionate about whatever side they choose
inb4 Garry banning me
inb4 Blue Screen banning me as well
inb4 Zemn laughing
inb4 using as BP.TF proof
inb4 staff closing this without giving any consideration to anything
inb4 cc. Tyc oon facepalming
inb4 Gaben smiting me dead with lightning for posting this

Completely unnecessary and irrelevant to the discussion.
Last edited by Blue Screen of Death; 21 Oct, 2013 @ 7:58pm
@ Zemn, sort of joking around
@ Blue Screen, added to discuss possible terms
@ BlueDemon, added to discuss possible terms
trash 21 Oct, 2013 @ 11:52pm 
I'm sitting on 12gigs of pony/furry porn myself.
That shit doesn't belong on outpost.
It's not funny or appropriate, not even ironically; as all those hip new age teenagers tend to do things.
< >
Showing 1-8 of 8 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: 21 Oct, 2013 @ 5:03pm
Posts: 8