STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
Membership by invitation only
STEAM GROUP
TF2 Outpost by Fanbyte
160,717
MEMBERS
4,140
IN-GAME
31,793
ONLINE
Founded
7 August, 2011
Language
English
Overview Announcements Discussions Events Members Comments Curator
CrateEyeHowl 21 Sep, 2012 @ 8:17pm
Was this relisting?
Please note, I'm very new to TF2 Outpost, this was an accident if it was against the rules, but I made a trade offering Tin Pot for an Infernal Orchestrina, and another trade offering Battery Bandolier for the Orchistrina. Was that relisting, or just two separate trades that happened to include the same item?
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
His Wardship 22 Sep, 2012 @ 2:28am 
I believe that could be called relisting, although I'd wait for an admins response. The point is, you made 2 trades where you could have used 1, which spams up the home page.
You could have easily put a tin pot and bandolier in one trade and said in the notes "Trading one of these for Orchistrina".
#1
Watson ℐℎℯ Crate 22 Sep, 2012 @ 3:26pm 
A relist has the SAME item in more then one trade for the same thing.

If you are like this
trade #1: tin pot for infernal orchestra
trade #2: tin pot/other hat for infernal orchestra
trade #3: tin pot for metal

That is relist

With metal/keys, not so much
trade #1: refined for infernal orchestra
trade #2: refined for key
NOT RELIST

However
trade #1: refined for internal orchestra
trade #2: refined + scrap for infernal orchestra
Not a relist by defination, but a duplicate trade
#2
CrateEyeHowl 22 Sep, 2012 @ 6:06pm 
Originally posted by Watson the Crate:
However
trade #1: refined for internal orchestra
trade #2: refined + scrap for infernal orchestra
Not a relist by defination, but a duplicate trade
That's closer to it. It was Tin Pot > Orchestrina, and Battery Bandolier > Orchestrina. Do you think that that was within the rules?
Last edited by CrateEyeHowl; 22 Sep, 2012 @ 6:07pm
#3
PurrrrC 22 Sep, 2012 @ 6:25pm 
I tihnk this was a bit unjust as it was a totally different offer; could have been avoided altogether if the trade contained both hats already.
#4
PurrrrC 22 Sep, 2012 @ 6:25pm 
However I must say it is best not argue such minor injustice to admins if you were banned for it then go for the argument.
#5
CrateEyeHowl 22 Sep, 2012 @ 6:45pm 
No, I'm not banned. I just want to clear up any mistake I made so I don't do it again, and then get banned.
#6
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: 21 Sep, 2012 @ 8:17pm
Posts: 6
Start a New Discussion

Discussions Rules and Guidelines