i wish you admins could unhide comments but yeah, they are permanantely hidden.

Originally posted by Sneeza™:

Champelliot answered it perfectly.

I second your motion and confirm your diagnoses good sir.

Originally posted by samhudson333:

No, the people it was owned by do not effect its value. It is also not against the rules to buy it, as long as you're buying it from someone clean.

Thank you

*My friend also wants to know if he is affected by having an item once owned by a scammer

Im very new to buying unusuals. If an unusual has someone marked for scamming in its history, is the value brought down?

Originally posted by Zemnmez:

Originally posted by ♙Hamid:

I don't know about you, but I live in a society where the best and most reasonable explanation is the correct one. We can't all go around and be agnostics, saying that: "Yea it might be not be duped, but we can't prove that, so we won't say that it is." Instead you just go off making no progress whatsoever, concluding that: It might be duped and it might not be duped.

> Help I cannot into science
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis

Why are people still commenting on this? It was a yes or no question, not a debate. Lol

Thanks everyone who posted. I dont really know why it matters if its duped but I know people will sell them for a lot less. I was thinking since it was such an ugly hat, I might wanna resell it and I dont wanna lose too much.

Nobody wants it if its duped. I dont know why people care, there is still others in existance. Nobody cares if there is 5 instead of 4. But nobody wants to buy them later.

Originally posted by Safe_Capsule™ (Idling):

It doesn't look duped at all. The trade history on OP looks good.

Alrighty, thanks

Originally posted by Zemnmez:

Does it matter?

Yes.