Thanks for the above advice, but the present point wasn't addressed (and y'all don't have authority on the site, so I'll take the views as unnecessary opinions).

The current objective of this is to reopen the other trades so that I may change the current copy-paste style of notes for the style of the sole trade of these that remains open currently so that they may retain the almost 2 years status that they had been open.

Again, with the lengthy amount of time they had been opened, they had been viewed by moderators (as can clearly be seen by the blocked posts within some of them). This brings to question; why now? Why, after such a long time of being open, were these trades closed? The previous moderators hadn't sought to even mention the trades likeness let alone close them for being relists.

As it stands, I am willing and able to change the notes as soon as the original trades are reopened.

Been almost a week now... Should I abandon hope for the trades reopening and just create new ones or had this request been forgotten?

I've made the remaining trade to look like what I intend to make the others look like if they are to be reopened. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15761001

Can/Will do.

Thanks ^_^

As you can see in the following links, I had 3 trades recently closed for being relists of a 4th trade of mine.

Here are the 3 that were closed:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15743702
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15760677
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15743741

Here's the 4th:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15761001

While the message/notes in the trades are identical, the trades themselves are not identical in that they feature different items I wish to buy/trade for. If I were able to list all of the items in 1 trade then I would condense these 4 trades into 1, but, as that's not possible on OP, I keep 4 trades open asking to buy/trade for 32 different items.

These trades had been opened for almost 2 years, and I would hope if it was such a problem it would have been noticed and made clear to me within a much shorter time.

I realize these trades had the same goal/purpose, but again, it was about making my goal/purpose known to people looking to sell any of the 32 items (instead of just 8) in which I had listed I was looking to buy/trade for.

If these trades are to remain closed, would opening new trades with the following message/notes be considered attempting to circumvent the rules or be grounds for closing trades with this message/these notes?
"Howdy!

I'm buying all of these for 1 ref each.

I'll buy as many as you're willing to sell.

Thanks and have a good one :3"

I'd personally prefer the original trades be reopened and I be allowed to change the message/notes to the above. This would allow my trades to keep their original date as almost 2 years ago, and allow those interested to clearly see my continued presence in the trade community.

Thanks for reading, and have a good day.

Da, understood. Thanks again for the help and good responses as usual BSoD! ^_^

Don't need to convey/pass along any message though. I would just be posting a trade for an item and telling people where to find it.
(just playing devils advocate for the sake of a response, just tell me to stop trying with this and I'll leave it alone )

I collect crafts #2783.
However, there is a specific craft #2783 that is owned by someone that has blocked me.
I would like to know if it was against any rules and if it's okay for me to make a trade wanting that specific item and posting the current owners outpost trade or steam profile within the trade.
Thanks in advance, and have a good one.

It's understandable to say my trade directly stated it's purpose and therefore its/my intent was clear, but is that the only thing a moderator would look for in determining if a trade is deemable as a price manipulation attempt? A clear statement of why I'm doing the trade?

Will do eventually, but do you see what I'm talking about with the end result being the same? My thing is that it's stupid to hate on activist trades when independent trades do the exact same thing.