Скорошни рецензии на blue

being very honest, this is still a good game but you should wait for the remaster. this game sorely lacks in some things, like modern screen resolutions.

if the remaster is bad then you can come back here and play this one. if the remaster is good, that would probably be the one to play over this.

this is a good game. anything i would criticize about it would be petty and purely subjective, because it is not for me. regardless, i think it's worth at least your consideration.

still good but needs a decent pass for modernisation in regards to controller support and supported resolutions. some of it can be fixed with mods and steam input, but having native options would be better.

other than that, it's the original splinter cell. predates ubisoft's garbage DRM so you can just install it and play as you will.

confidence is a slow and insidious killer except in this game where it will kill you really fast. i think mullet madjack is a pretty damn good game and dismissing it as "boomer shooter for zoomers" is selling the game short. it's a very frantic time and can get demanding, but plowing through hordes of robots feels pretty damn good.

my cute girlfriend quit because i didn't make her stressed enough.

this is a game you play for the story. there's nothing wrong with the gameplay - matter of fact the combat is pretty alright - but it's nothing you haven't seen a thousand times by now. open-world checklist is a pretty decent summary for that part of the game.

game regularly goes on sale for a handful of pennies, and i would say i think it's at least worth a look, if only because the game feeds you a lot of story regularly.

it's quake, i bought it because i thought buying the id pack would be a good idea 15 years ago. really nothing much to say. it's quake.

i love this game. the gameplay is great. i love having anime girls scream in my ear every 3 seconds. overstimulation nightmare. i cannot recommend it enough. thank you inti create.

lost eidolons is, at its core, what i affectionately think of as a "b-tier" rpg. in the past, this would've been considered a big release considering the production on display, but in modern times, it inserts itself comfortably in that sort of in between.

the game is a strategy rpg that mostly plays by the rulebook - class progression, a story that serves as a way to introduce more maps & characters, character bonds, etc. it also plays by the rulebook relatively well. i guess if i had to criticize it, it's that the map are somewhat dull, being all variations of medieval battlefield. not a problem for me personally, but something i can easily see people getting bothered by.

topping it off is a pretty decent voice acting cast - essentially b-tier fire emblem three houses - that made me actually sit through cutscenes and wait for the performances. i usually read faster than voices and just kinda glance over voice acting, but i think it's pulled off well here and it definitely grabbed my attention.

as a whole? a pretty decent package. i like it a lot. i think there's a lot to enjoy here. i don't think it's perfectly - definitely some seams that show cracks, being this studio's first game. which i think is fine, i like jank and light ambition in my video games.

if you are looking for a massive production, this isn't it. if you arent a fan of strategy games, this also is not for you. if you're looking for a game that has heart and clear direction, this is it.

battle chasers is a good game.

at its core, it's pure turn-based fun. there's not a lot to hold you back here - characters function a specific way, interact with each others nicely, and combat is pretty satisfactory. layer on top of that a not too bad world (map/dungeons) and you have a pretty decent package.

dungeons are decently paced, and having pre-set encounters (you can avoid) is a good addition. none of them feels like they overstay their welcome, but encourage revisiting them on higher difficulties for better loot. which is topped by having some collectibles merchants to take some stuff off your hands or let you craft stuff.

aesthetically and visually, the game hits all the right notes as well - pretty to look at and enjoy. a good way to complement the gameplay.

battle chasers is also a slow game.

now this isn't necessarily a bad thing, but at its core the game is also slow - animations are drawn out, battles take a bit to start up, walking is not the fastest and there's no run button. on all those points, the game feels more methodical. is that good? is that bad? it feels like it makes the game last longer than it actually is. which i guess is bad. but at the same time it lets you take in how pretty the game is. which is good i think. eventually it does start to wear thin because you start fighting similar enemies/archetypes. which is bad. especially when every. special. attack. always plays in full.

i'm not going to pretend this is a bad game - it's good. but it's also drawn out a moderate bit by the speed of the game. i think that part specifically will annoy a lot of people. maybe not enough to turn them off the game. but i still think there's something decent on offer here.