10
Число
обзоров
383
Количество
продуктов

Последние обзоры Linver

1–10 из 10
Ещё никто не посчитал этот обзор полезным
1,194.6 ч. всего
I have play it for 1,194.6 hours..
Опубликовано 5 августа 2024 г.
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
Пользователей, посчитавших обзор полезным: 6
10.5 ч. всего (9.9 ч. в момент написания)
Skinned version of the first title.

Maybe worth for how haven't play the first one, for the small refinements that they have done,
but this doesn't justify the cost of a new game, in fact, in the first crowdfunding campaign, this was meant to be a DLC, but was canceled for not reaching the required quota.
Опубликовано 11 февраля 2024 г.
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
 
Ответ разработчика от 14 фев. 2024 г. в 22:21 (просмотреть ответ)
Ещё никто не посчитал этот обзор полезным
6.7 ч. всего (4.2 ч. в момент написания)
Had it been longer I would have also paid for it.
Опубликовано 25 июня 2022 г.
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
Ещё никто не посчитал этот обзор полезным
126.6 ч. всего (85.9 ч. в момент написания)
Обзор продукта в раннем доступе
What to say, after my first gameplay of 70 hours, I'm satisfy and I'm waiting for play the game when will be completed (and now the game already feel very full). For 17€ is very worth, if u like the genre u can't regret of play it, and will be worth a lot of hours of play.
Опубликовано 25 июля 2021 г.
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
Пользователей, посчитавших обзор полезным: 3
1 пользователь посчитал этот обзор забавным
179.2 ч. всего (157.0 ч. в момент написания)
Обзор продукта в раннем доступе
After having played the game deeply (160+ hours), this is what I have to say: don't buy this game.

I LIKE it A LOT. The game has a lot of potential, and many concepts are very ingenious, but it has a big problem... the development team. The developers don't know how to prioritize development. There are bugs that have been open for more than a year. One of the main parts of the game is power management, yet they spend time adding new mechanics that remain incomplete. For example, they added a trading system that is still broken (traders give very random prices on some items and sometimes bug out), or the uranium ore, which has been implemented for years but still has no use. It's a game with a high level of modularity—you can even program in MIPS to automate! (without data/array)—and then you start each game knowing that the only way to have sustainable power is to create a boring line of solar panels or wind turbines, depending on the planet.

Each player starts with a very nice sensation while playing: there are many things to put together, a perfect environment for survival, and many mechanics to manage. But it all ends with questioning why the ghost collision box causes the spacesuit to explode, why the tablet never works the first time, why the power network is unpredictable, and why setting up a (gas fuel) combustion generator is more difficult than constructing a spaceship. After the 10th "why" and a look at the changelogs, you'll understand that the developers will never put their effort into the right places.

The game is what it is now, and because it is a pure sandbox with no "win condition," you will stop playing when you get sick of it. I think after 10 hours you will see a lot of problems. And yes, I played more than 10 hours because I'm stubborn (trying to close my eyes so many times that I ended up playing puffing), but because I'm not you, what I have to say is: don't risk it. There are many other games on Steam.
Опубликовано 25 июля 2021 г. Отредактировано 6 июля 2024 г..
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
1 пользователь посчитал этот обзор полезным
26.3 ч. всего
Обзор продукта в раннем доступе
- The game implement permanent upgrades on characters. When u find in a match players with many upgrades they have a significant bonus on the game, also on possible craftable equipment
- No matchmaking mechanics, any player can match with teams on high or lower level of account
- Marketing wipes
- Suspicious in game money system (future premium value?)
Опубликовано 22 мая 2021 г. Отредактировано 24 мая 2021 г..
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
Пользователей, посчитавших обзор полезным: 9
1 пользователь посчитал этот обзор забавным
39.8 ч. всего (10.5 ч. в момент написания)
Nice factory/TD game, for me first that have a good enemy mechanics, compared to other game like Factorio, simple production chain and more complex defence and interesting behavior of buildings, I really appreciated it.
The game has some problems: the interface sometime isn't clear, and need a in game blueprint system(some copy and paste for buidlings setup, is very annoy sometime). Whole game should be improved for sure, but is worth for the price (also is free on the main website without multiplayer)
Опубликовано 29 сентября 2019 г.
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
Пользователей, посчитавших обзор полезным: 4
2.8 ч. всего (2.2 ч. в момент написания)
Опубликовано 10 сентября 2019 г. Отредактировано 10 сентября 2019 г..
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
Ещё никто не посчитал этот обзор полезным
12.6 ч. всего (6.9 ч. в момент написания)
This game is really nice, have a good game mechanics, a fantastic light effect, the piece is acceptable, and I haven't find apparent bug. This very nice to be able to play with other peope, but i want say... WHAT THE F**** I MUST USE TUNNGLE OR HAMACHI FOR PLAY COOP BECAUSE IS ONLY LOCAL, BUT I CAN PLAY PVP ONLINE, ANYONE CAN GIVE ME A LOGIC REASON?
Опубликовано 1 апреля 2015 г.
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
Пользователей, посчитавших обзор полезным: 5
1.3 ч. всего
The game is funny but crash random, it's very noise, is unplayable, i think that i have lost my money in this in this purchase.
Опубликовано 23 ноября 2014 г.
Был ли этот обзор полезен? Да Нет Забавный Наградить
1–10 из 10