Butikssida

Ravenfield

Alla Diskussioner Skärmbilder Konst Sändningar Filmer Workshop Nyheter Guider Recensioner

Ravenfield > Workshop > DAI_QUOC[JP]s workshop

179 betyg

[OLD][EA25]Nambu Type14

Beskrivning Diskussioner0 Kommentarer23 Ändringar

Utmärkelse

Content Type: Weapons

Taggar: Modded Content

Filstorlek

Lades upp

Uppdaterades

5.726 MB

25 aug, 2019 @ 7:31

22 jul, 2021 @ 3:02

5 ändringsnotiser ( visa )

5,509	Unika besökare
3,854	Nuvarande abonnemang
576	Nuvarande favoriter

Abonnera för att ladda ner
[OLD][EA25]Nambu Type14

Abonnerar

Avbryt abonnemang

I 2 samlingar av DAI_QUOC[JP]

The imperial rerising

32 artiklar

The Battle Of Shanghai Content

33 artiklar

Beskrivning

The Nambu pistols (南部拳銃 or 南部大型自動拳銃 Nanbu kenjuu or Nanbu ōgata jidou-kenjuu) were a series of semi-automatic pistols produced by the Japanese company Koishikawa Arsenal later known as the Tokyo Artillery Arsenal.
The series had five variants, the Type A Model 1902 (also called the Grandpa Nambu), the Type A Model 1902 Modified (also known as the Papa Nambu), the Type B (also known as the Baby Nambu), the Type 14 (南部十四年式自動拳銃) and the Type 94.

The pistols were designed by Kijiro Nambu and saw extensive service during the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II. The Type A was made in very small numbers. Type A Modified and Type B Nambus were never formally adopted by any branch of the armed forces of Imperial Japan but were sold to officers through officer stores. The Type 14 was adopted as an official sidearm. (-Wikipedia)

23 kommentarer

< >

Gagoge 12 nov, 2023 @ 22:30

Just look for people who actually have a well maintained nambu, it's not regarded as a a bad weapon by anyone who knows a damn.

Gagoge 12 nov, 2023 @ 22:29

No the gun really wasn't that bad, it's just acoustic American soldiers not knowing how to use weapons, keeping them in terrible condition and then some random guy with no knowledge of the gun using it 120 to 70 years later and lo and behold it works terribly. The spring and firing pin issues were not particularly significant and the 94 was far more reliable. Then there are articles like this shit https://www.19fortyfive.com/2023/05/nambu-the-worst-military-gun-to-ever-fire-a-shot/ where the author combine elements of both the 14 and 94 and also seems to no nothing about how the gun works, claiming the gun was prone to misfiring when not just was this attributed the the type 94 anyway it was because some idiots would press down the partially exposed firing sear (which you'd have to do very firmly) which when on safety couldn't even be pressed down anyway.
I mean the gun was first designed in 1904.