Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What you have said about KSV and a Madison,
KSV - “and the semi-auto firing is slow but still faster than a bolt-action rifle”
Madison – you have basically said nothing about its rate of fire, which is maximum for this rifle.
Now what I am saying is, even if you had mentioned it, it would have been bad information. Why? Well a field testing comes in handy in this scenario. A field testing says otherwise. The KSV has the highest rpm, not the Madison, even though the game claims it. Now this could have been useful “in choosing the right rifle that fits a particular playstyle”, if it was to be found on this guide. Now I have to do the field testing myself, which can cost me money and I might end up with the wrong rifle.
The main reason I made this guide was to display the special ammo types that each rifle can use since that is not shown to the player before purchasing. It's the guide I wish I'd had on my first playthrough.
"This is the most expensive rifle in the game, though I'm not sure it warrants it."
Well, fair enough. But this particular sniper rifle is most expensive because it is the only sniper rifle which can be used for all ranges, its an universal range weapon and tuned to fit in almost every situation. This is why it costs that much.
The guide does not provide anything more than what the game offers already and are trivially obvious to any player who wishes to see it. It lacks the proper addressal of barrel attachments and how one can use the mobility and target acquisition parameters which are the biggest flaws of this guide.
I have my points, if you want to address them, address them with numbers. Although I must say, all the things I say is for the sake of argument, and nothing more. I have the same respect as I had before for you as a fellow player.