Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If all this is true, the only true fix to the exploit you've found would be to either make population and GDP grow exponentially like debt does, or make debt not grow exponentially and instead approach a constant fraction of your GDP based off your interest rate and deficit to GDP ratio (to replicate how debt-to-GDP should approach a constant ratio without actually having to program in exponential population and GDP growth). Without that fix, there's always going to be an unavoidable choice between "The debt crisis is unavoidable and crippling" and "The debt crisis is unavoidable and exploitable because it's not crippling enough".
... if all of the above is true, anyways. Is there any way to get in contact with the developers (Positech Games) and ask them if this is true?
In past games, this crippled you and seemed unavoidable, so the developer nerfed the effects of the debt crisis into the ground as a quick-fix. But that was too big a nerf, now you can completely ignore the effects of overwhelming debt by taking out even more debt to spend even more money on more policies. But the developer probably isn't going to change things back (make having a debt crisis actually hurt) because people complained about the unavoidable debt crisis for a reason, it was dragging down their enjoyment of the game.
(Continued in next comment)
(Continued in next comment)