Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
I didnt like the lack of antines though.
And I stand by what I said: the most talented maps designers don't need to resort to this approach to make their puzzles challenging. In fact, some of the most challenging tests have no elements at all: Momentum by Mevious is a great example of such a test.
The idea that I can't produce a valid critique of a puzzle because I " obviously don't know enough about making tests" makes as much sense as telling someone they can't tell healthy teeth from bad teeth because they're not a dentist.
I suggest you study the map from the masters (Mevious, Ben77, Azorae, Tmast98, LoneWolf and others) and learn from them. The cube cleaning thing was original however... just not very elegant.