Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As for your analysis on US units (including ARVN), you should talk about how infantry can ambush enemies, giving them a slight increase in attack chances. ARVN infantry's combat capability is not weak, but not as strong as key units like artillery. They can be used in combat just like US infantry where you can set up ambushes. In fact, they should be replacing the US infantry's role in attacks where they are busy elsewhere. For example, US infantry should generally stay in bases for defense by setting up ambushes inside while ARVN partake intelligence operations. One thing to note is that infantry combat should be kept at a minimum.