Yeah I cant imagen this still works.

Creature spawning logic has been messed with so much over the last four years that this is unlikely to still work, but there has been changes to the discoveries log to inform the player what their missing creatures are, in terms of environment and rarity.

So it still works?

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

It's always fish on toxic planets for me, since they never have oceans.

doesn't work in the latest update

Thanks for this helpful pokemon shiny guide :)

Fair enough! Happy exploring :)

Well Rh; this guide is for thelast pesky one and it is nver a fish nor bird nor cave dweller; So It is easy to discern whether it is either a fish, bird or a land creature that is the last creature. Just read of where the ????? is situated. And ther is never a hard aka pesky" creature neither underground nor fish nor bird.
Equal it is always a landcreature walkin around on the surface if it takes longer then 3 landings to find it. Equal deduced that ther last one is a hard pesky creature.

And OFC one have to be adaptable and use the available information to "know" where the last one/2 are.

But every single time this works if one have deduced away the fishes and birds during the initial procces (Personally I always go for the possible fishes and if ther is any birds they will begin show next/over the water.
Just add a few landings next to a area with caves or similar, and it is super easy to deduce/force the last one to be a land creature on the surface.

Pretty good strategy, I use it frequently. But your success rate is just misleading. Not all landing pads are near lakes/oceans/caves, etc. Too many variables. But it does work a good portion of the time, just doesn't address the probability.

Also doesn't really matter if it's a landing pad or not.. It could be any station.

Just to preface, I've scanned over 30 planets, I'd say this works at best 50% of the time.