Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Why use three 0.5*0.1 blocks/slopes instead of a single 1*0.2 slope ?
You could merge the 1*0.2, the 1*0.4, and the blocks below into a single 1*0.9 block
And use a single 1* 0.3 slope for the bottom
And so on...
Also, if I counted properly, this circle has 44 sides (on the outside only). I know the point is to make a circle that looks like circle instead of a box, but I think this is too much. I'd go for 16 sides (still talking only about the outside) total to make it easier to build and reduce the performance impact. Plus, using less but bigger blocks means each block has more health, making it harder to pierce through the armor.