安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You could definitely bend the rules and break certain parts of what SFM isn't capable of and make it look great. I think good examples are the ones made by Cen0
or this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UN6b_1fELGw
Yes, technically these principles are usually primarily for traditional animations for 2d, but since 3d is all about what the camera can see and its perspective, that's the main thing that you can apply some of the principles here for. The idea is that you can cheat a model's positioning to where you can bring out those exaggerations, overshoot, squash and stretch.
Even solid drawing is applicable to SFM. It's a cousin principle to squash and stretch. Solid drawing is so prevalent by default, that you might not realize it's present in a 3-dimensional space. Almost everything is 3D, therefore there's solid drawing in almost everything.
But what if the appearance of solid drawing wasn't there?
What if you took camera angles from really far away with a really low FOV? You'd flatten everything. That flatness can crush the space between two objects, or create dramatic effect.
Anyone curious about what I'm talking about, go watch the credits in ceno0's "Pootis Engage // EXTREME." There's lots of behind-the-scenes clips in the bottom right corner, where they show off how things were done.