Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Charles II, based on the people that actually know about him beyond his deformations, was a righteous Christian man who was, either because his administrators were benevolent or he was able to understand justice, not a bad king and benefited Spain during his (or his regents') rule.
Charles II is not responsible for being deformed and, by all accounts, seemed to have overcome it enough to win the hearts and minds of the Spainards.
> [Charles II] was a good king, enacted several administrative reforms by his own, and he was called "one of the best kings of our times" by his contemporaneous. He was a pious person and when he died the Pope said that he was might to become a Blessed. Please, before slandering a person that suffered...
Okay, so while I agree that it's certainly mean-spirited to mock him, poking fun at him being so grossly deformed that his corpse did not bleed during his autopsy and his his IQ was room temperature is not an attack on his character .
Hmm, no drool...nevertheless, approved.
*Stamps seal*
Albeit, they had that distinct chin all the way back in 900 AD.