Is an update for 1.6 planned?

Late, but if you want manual control over sexuality trait distribution then you want Sexuality Traits (continued by Mlie): https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3297325000

I have used it together with this mod with good results. (Well, "good" for the bisexual colonist who just divorced her husband to date another bisexual lady. The ex-husband may not be as pleased.)

finally found a mod thatll let me recreate my love life, wait where are the female colonist

Does anyone know if this still works in 1.6?

@iamnotawindmill
Check out RimJobWorld. Not listed on Steam Workshop as it is very NSFW.

@сэр Суер-Выер
Tell me you're an incel without telling me.

what is 原野 on about bro :sob: holy schizo

Unfortunately Cyep, I think you're just an undesirable.

Do you have any recommendations for mods that add sexuality traits to all pawns like Rational Romance? I enjoyed being able to have the majority of my pawns be bisexual, but I like the sound of this mod's approach to the rest of the attraction system better.

Unrealistic. Women never pursue romantic encounters irl, not even at 15% rate.

好耶不用手動上雙性戀了

@Oddbase

So bold of you to assume their gender. Don't you see their Ying Yang symbol? That clearly means they identify as non-binary.

i dont think anyone ever said that bro

Women: Oh well, it's clear that the game mechanics themselves don't give female pawns equal status, so I'll create a mod for anyone who need it, so everyone can flirt equally and normally!

mAles (aka Stinky Incels): OH.MY.GOD! HOW DARE you make gender more equal in the game? You don't like seeing my 56-year-old pawn, which is basically my own avatar, having a harem in a FANTASY RIMWORLD GAME? Oh my god, this is so UNREALISTIC!!!!!! *Triggered**Writhing in discomfort*

Since this mod has been reported working in 1.5 I added it to the No Version Warning-mod
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2599504692

Not in vanilla, just checked the changelogs

Update?

im pretty sure its vanilla right now

Thank you, @Melvinthebirb! I totally love this mod. It's so perfect in my Matriarch societies. I hope it get an update soon

I tested to see if this worked on 1.5 and I just want to report that it works!!

This mod is a must have in every playthrough of mine :) Hopefully it gets updated to 1.5 sometime in the future

Never knew this was a thing. Just saw that my female pawn didn't like my male pawn, and thought 'huh' when I could force her to romance him.

The fact this isn't in the base game is moronic. For non-psychology users this is a must have. Sexism is cringe

Could you please make this compatible with "Way Better Romance"? That'd be much appreciated :)

In my many hours of Rimworld I never knew about this "feature". It explains quite a few things. Thank you for the mod.

girls arent real dumb dumb ↓

Is this compatible with real life?

Can you make a patch for real life?

so i *wasn't* crazy when i noticed that one guy was flirting with all the girls in the tribe but the only time i got women doing their bisexual thing was when no guys were around :sob: absolute life saver you are

Anyone know how this interacts with 'Way Better Romance'? I know that mod is not compatible with Rational Romance also.

the least immersive mod smh

Thanks for sorting that out

Actually, I just decided to fix it. Latest update should support 1.3 again! Lesson learned and sorry to anyone who was impacted!

@ExoticQuack It isn't. Naively, I'd assumed that mods wouldn't auto-update for people still on 1.3... if anyone is impacted by this, let me know and I'll figure out a way to be compatible with both versions again.

Is it still compatible with 1.3?

Weird as fuck base calculations, thanks for fixing lol

Updated to 1.4! I haven't tested it extensively so please give it a shot and report back if anything is awry.

This is a great mod and I really love that you took your time to fix the mess Tynan has made, so... some serious heartfelt thanks from me~

I think the author made a slight mstake in how the description is worded. Bisexuals are not 15% as likely to romance (or be romanced) in general, they are 15% as likely to romance (or be...) with someone of their own gender. (I think the "paired" check in itself is a good idea, since it makes pawns less likely to hit on someone that won't be interested anyway.)

In the "harem" scenario in the description, this would indeed make the bisexual women even more likely to try to romance the man than each other.

Aside from the "women are 15% as likely to flirt" part, I think the mistake in the vanilla code is that no one thought to update it when the asexual and bisexual traits were added, so it treats them as straight for this calculation.

I was thinking of doing a mod related to this, so I was both looking around to see what was already made and looking into the romance code. Looking at the code for this mod, I think that it accomplishes most of what I was thinking of doing, and will reccomend this one instead of doing my own.

@Xenofell : The part that you in the code comments describe as "weird gay attraction thing" attempts to do the same thing as the function you replace it with, but they forgot about asexual and bisexual, and they wrote it in a super confusing way (nesting ?: is a big no-no imho). I think your version is about as clean as that can be done.

most unrealistic mod

take a shot every time he says bisexual

Why isn't this standard? Why are the normal numbers so effing wrong?

So I checked the incompatible mods. But does this work with romance on the rim?
Romance on the rim adds a romance need for couples and there are precepts for ideology that change certain romance chances. But from what I know they aren't gender based.

huh, never knew this was a problem in vanilla, installing right away

I'm going to assume the answer is no, but is this compatible with 1-2-3 Personality?

@sormly500 hippo milk is pink.

Since we are mentioning things that have nothing to do with the mod. 🙄

thinking future society will be different from modern society is very wishful thinking

i feel like adding age preferences into a game with specificity is a bit... odd on the devs part. why not just do if both pawns are above the age of 18 they can date?

either way, i didn't know these stats existed, thanks for teaching me something new about the game.

Love that in base the future has decided to be even further behind socially then today.