安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Btw is there going to be a version with shorter trains?
Have you seen the electrics they tested in 1975/1976 (they used the years as the road numbers) the had a similar feel but based more off of road switchers than the mainline wide cab units.
The length restriction was part of the nationalization, per @REVO's lore, along with abolishing PSR (because it is not "precision", it's not "scheduled" and barely qualifies as railroading). I'm sure the logic behind it was to ensure trains could actually fit in passing sidings, which has actually been a problem in recent years under PSR. Trains have gotten longer, yes, but the railroads have done practically nothing to improve their infrastructure to accommodate them, so trains are blocking each other more frequently, which is why service has deteriorated (all those supply chain shortages we've been having are partly the result of PSR).
Also, hello from a fellow Ohio-adjacent pleb (I live about an hour away from that dumpster fire).
Also I love the details @evil.iguana added. I'm a state away from that incident if you are talking about Ohio lol
Also, the Evolution locomotive is named after the Evolution diesel engine that powers it, so... a locomotive that doesn't even have one would probably be called something else... And not have giant radiators and fuel tank...
You're about 20 days early m8.