Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
and manuever at .0 air drive,
take off at aroun .70 air drive
YOU'RE AN ALIEN FROM ZEEBLEBLORP NINE AREN'T YOU?! I know your secret, zeebleblorpian!
EMP missiles are a 1 hit kill on almost all vehicles
(aircraft are particularly vunerable because you can't lug a 3 block thick layer of surge protectors around)
with fewer than 500 to 750 blocks.
@Major Missile
I was torn between having a top speed of 80m/s and having saws for wings. Because the wing sweep is 45 degrees the airflow hits it like a brick wall unless I make it nice and sharp.
While it's good that people are making the most of the game mechanics, I feel that using stuff like this is just a tad too chessy in campaign. Even so, it looks very nice and even without the exploit would probably still do well in the early stages of the campaign by itself in small groups.
The super hornet uses exploits like spin blocks generating no drag and placing objects inside eachother and is not only way more expensive but also more than 15 times less efficient.
(this thing's fuel efficiency is rpm1.8L/s, the super hornet's efficiency is rpm30L/s according to the workshop page.)