ubgrade pls

@Sorypsi It still works fine for me. One of my favorite mods. Very grateful to the author for its creation.

she doesn't work anymore, cap'n. rest in peace

does this still work in 2.3? it sounds pretty good, i'll give it a shot

Needs updating to 2.3

mod works fine, only thing that would be done if updated would be to remove the anomaly fail risk since you can no longer fail now. should work fine eitherway unless paradox changes the automated tech directly and drastically

To my understanding, this mod is compatible no matter what. It only activates the auto explore button on the science ships so you can click on it. This mod only gives you the automatic exploration function. I mean, unless they change the location of the auto explore button on the science ships this mod should be compatible with any version of Stellaris

Can confirm, this mod still works in 2.0.1

update?

Well, I see no reason why it would not work with the current version

unfortunate.

lol

Sadly it appears the author has no plans to update this or his other mods.

"12:30 PM - Yandersen: And I have no intentions to waste my time on that shitty game."

@yandersen are there any plans to update this mod? if not i would be happy to update the mod for you and re-upload or just send it to you

Technically this works just fine with 1.8 as it uses new replacement files instead of modifiying base gam files.

Update pls

please update

In general, if a mod changes gameplay or core game files, it disables achievements. The only ones that don't that I'm aware of are ones that fiddle with colors, portraits, and backgrounds - Even then, some of those disable it.

I just assume that all mods disable achievements.

Does this mod affect Ironman mode achievements? This is my only mod and achievements are not unlocking in Ironman mode for me. It could also be a fault on my side i guess.

Yes it actually does - just a typo, sorry.
Corrected the description, thanks.

Shouldn't "Automated Exploration Protocols" give a anomaly fail risk of -10 % instead of +10% ?

Oh yes, thank u, I will.

@Yandersen what bonuses did you add to the exploration tech specifically? You should update the description with that kind of stuff.

Thank god!

I think it should be.

yea i would also like to know if this mod is save compatible

is this mod save compatible? :D

I've had the same issues with overwriting tech as @Pode has, with non-FTL techs. There have been some which worked fine, and others that didn't. I never tracked down what was different.

willvette, that is what this mod does! Well, actually, I added few other small bonuses to vanilla as well - a whole tech for just a single +50% exploration speed seemed not enough, IMHO.

Huh. Turns out that's just one more way starting FTL techs are annoyingly special. Overwriting them or things that depend on them doesn't work the same way as overwriting other techs. TIL.

A balince idea would be to leave the scan speed upgrade as the researched tech and use the automated exploration right from the start.

Indeed, the log complains about duplication, but I tested it and confirmed to be working. I do this in my other mods as well - no problems so far. The only issue I had was with traits in the other mod - for overwriting the vanilla traits using trait duplicate you should play with file name in opposite way meaning that definition from vanilla file should overwrite the modded one (so use 000_... file name instead of 01_...).

I'm afraid this will produce two identically labeled AEP techs, one with your changes and one with vanilla effects. At least that's how duplicating vanilla techs worked for me. if you manage to avoid this problem please teach me how you did so.

Oh, thanks. I just started wondering if people found some kind of problem I am not aware of or something... 4/5 now, feels better. :)

There's probably nothing wrong with the mod, its just that the rating system isn't a reflection of just the up/down vote ratio. I don't know exactly what the formula is, but something on the workshop has to get a certain number of total ratings - up or down - before the star rating reflects that ratio so there aren't big rating swings at low numbers. Personally, I've never seen anything on the workshop with five stars unless it had at least 200 ratings.

In other words, it's pretty normal for a mod with only 25 ratings to have three stars, and those 25 ratings are probably all positive.

3/5 rating??? Why so? Can anyone give some feedback? Is there something wrong with the mod?

i l o v e i t

Nice testing now.

Perfection