安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I know right :D
Because Indies hold a special place in our hearts, we are willing to build these avatars for Scott or others (like Kerbals for MaxMaps) and for other indie creators absolutely for free and add them in FaceRig as free avatars (or if their owners insist to make money off them, even as paid DLC). The owner only needs to say "yes" and we'll do all the work from there on.
It boggles the mind why anyone who is looking for extra exposure would not want to have a character in FaceRig :D. Their Twitch let's plays could be so much more entertaining :D. I see literally no downside to it. But.. to each their own :D. Maybe they are afraid of the legal aspect of external licensing their characters, or maybe they are afraid of the open creation factor ( more precisely of Internet rule 34 of which no-one is safe anyway) , who knows...
We already have lined up more characters than we can build internally in the immediate future :D (for starters we have to finish building the TF2 cast :D )