It came out in 2021. I watched the forums eagerly for a few months and now check in every now and again. If a UI mod hasn't happened by now, it will probably never happen.

It's a great shame, I'd like to play this but the UI if horrific... I keep going back to the original - which TBH still looks fine and runs on modern systems, despite what some people say.

Yeah tbh, I think the original with mods is way better than this 'remaster'- the remaster mods still need a ton of work to catch up to the most detailed original ones (compare Roma Surrectium III vs Roma Surrecta)

Its a shame really.

i think for the UI your all right. But the rest of the game is decent. I mean there's now much more to mod. upscaling stuff, making enormous maps, the limits are now deleted. Which make the remaster better if mods can bypass some things from the first version of Rome.
But yeah the first game is still relevant to play in 2025.

Roma Surrectia IV is unironically still better than the best mods for this demake, the new ui and regional recruitment skin colorization sjw boolshiet kinda ruins this for me.


The limits in the old version unironically just you know- kept that insane ambition of the modders in cheque because the new versions of the same mods have like 1000~2000 f'ing settlements making the game unplayable.

it's just balancing. As the game changes many things, modders needs to adapt their ambitions/lower them to be playable.
I think RTR is exagerated, but glory of Rome is not for example. They are many mods that need to focus on a playable and not boring experience which take more time to create.

And you are right in some ways. But it's something that will get better with the experience of modding it.

I hated the UI but I got used to it. Now its very practical. Like it alot.
But the stupid "status rings" or whatever they are called, got deactivated right away. These things really are ugly on the battlefield