Cities: Skylines

Cities: Skylines

251 vurderinger
285 Lexington Avenue
2
   
Pris
Føj til foretrukne
Gjort til foretrukken
Fjern som foretrukken
Filstørrelse:
Offentliggjort:
Opdateret:
4.502 MB
4. feb. 2021 kl. 7:53
4. feb. 2021 kl. 8:19
2 ændringsbemærkninger ( vis )

Abonner for at downloade
285 Lexington Avenue

Beskrivelse
Growable / level 5 / 2x4 / 1024x1024/ 1756 tris / LOD 256x256 / 28 tris

Based on residential building at 285 Lexington Ave, NYC.

Built in 1974.
16 kommentarer
crack monkey 7. jan. 2023 kl. 12:13 
I really want the patreon buildings but you're sold out, how would i get them?
SubaruSVX 18. dec. 2022 kl. 16:36 
It was never mentioned how one gets the prop right?

I mean, I wouldn't mind paying for it.
darcula2000 19. juli 2022 kl. 21:10 
For285LexingtonProp error
no effect but load screen is warning.
i am OCD patients, i can not see warning
bryanf37 16. jan. 2022 kl. 5:58 
True you don't need the prop, but when you have 156 such errors from creators not fixing their builds it means taking 30 minutes to load the game as it looks for the missing assets until it gives up. The whole point of LSM is to see the errors and correct them to load the game faster. Fix the damn building and I'll give you a Paypal donation.
wormson 31. dec. 2021 kl. 4:27 
You don't need the prop to use the building; it's just an extra piece of decoration :)
Sky 19. dec. 2021 kl. 12:59 
Asset bug: Workshop asset uses private asset (For285LexingtonProp.For285LexingtonProp_Data)
Glam_Helen 11. apr. 2021 kl. 16:06 
Same problem... Getting missing on LSM :steamsad: sadly unsub
TeaEarlGayHot 25. mar. 2021 kl. 21:41 
I got the same error message as @lunachix...hoping for a fix, these go great in my city!
lunachix 22. mar. 2021 kl. 8:13 
LSM throwing error: For285LexingtonProp... Asset bug: Workshop asset uses private asset (For285LexingtonProp.For285LexingtonProp_Data)... un/resub'd no help "The workshop building tries to include the prop; but the prop is not found. It is not found because it is not a workshop asset. The person who published the building probably published the prop as well but by mistake used the original, private, prop in the building instead of the published one."
sevenof9 8. feb. 2021 kl. 2:23 
Looks Great