安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
The other horse drawn stuff goes 6.4kmh tho
Sure, you are welcome to use it.
It looks like a very good improvement idea so I will take it into consideration.
Thanks for the suggestion!
a couple of suggestions:
How about reducing the amount of howitzers in a single battalion to 12 guns (down from 36)
and then reducing the combat width to 1 (from 3)
alternatively reducing the amount of howitzers in a single battalion to 24 guns and the combat width to 2
36 guns per battalion is just awkward in base game (3 combat width is also really awkward)
on another note:
How about giving vehicle towed artillery clearly better stats than horse towed guns? IRL motorised artillery was just far more effective than horse. (rn motorised only increases recovery rate)
on another note:
Can you give AT guns substantially more soft attack, because rn they are borderline useless unless the enemy has tanks. IRL they were also used as any other infantry gun. HE was just important then AP shells for them.