安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
The other horse drawn stuff goes 6.4kmh tho
Sure, you are welcome to use it.
It looks like a very good improvement idea so I will take it into consideration.
Thanks for the suggestion!
a couple of suggestions:
How about reducing the amount of howitzers in a single battalion to 12 guns (down from 36)
and then reducing the combat width to 1 (from 3)
alternatively reducing the amount of howitzers in a single battalion to 24 guns and the combat width to 2
36 guns per battalion is just awkward in base game (3 combat width is also really awkward)
on another note:
How about giving vehicle towed artillery clearly better stats than horse towed guns? IRL motorised artillery was just far more effective than horse. (rn motorised only increases recovery rate)
on another note:
Can you give AT guns substantially more soft attack, because rn they are borderline useless unless the enemy has tanks. IRL they were also used as any other infantry gun. HE was just important then AP shells for them.