Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Arcana has built-in support to add the new planets into the TrueSpace/RealSpace planetary classification system.
However, Arcana also adds a bunch of new types of Moons, which are not barren/empty like the vanilla moons. When used with RealSpace, this means that Arcana moons generate very frequently, at the same rate as vanilla/"barren" moons. This is contrary to the design philosophy of RealSpace which is to make habitable planets (or non-barren planets more generally) rare.
So, tldr, you can run the two mods together, but RealSpace's philosophy of an empty universe is not respected by Arcana's TrueSpace patch.
AGiantPie, are you sure that Arcana may be compatible with TrueSpace/RealSpace?
This is quote from the Arcana wiki "Arcana adds many new planets (...) Each of the planets can be found within the 5 new stars (...) ".
Salsa -> https://starboundarcana.miraheze.org/wiki/Planets
I am hoping that the worst case is that those worlds don't spawn at all. It wouldn't be a huge loss because they have nothing on them. They're almost like a more spooky version of a barren world.