Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
And only if you do, in fact, use lithium batteries. Which is far superior to lead-acid, NiCD, or classic NiMH*.
* = Newer NiMH using polyacene anodes may have 2x the density of LFP, but has relatively poor speed of charge/discharge, but ~2x-5x the cyclic life! Properly cared for, even old NiMH can outlast lipo, but LFP usurped the battery market until recently.
Point is, solar panels mostly use silicon, copper, and aluminium and are HIGHLY recycleable, covering Mono and Polycrystalline panels. Flexible amorphous and thin-film use different materials and involve rare earth materials, such as Indium and Gallium, and are NOT recycleable in addition to having half the life expectancy, producing more heavy, and having between 1/2 and 1/3 the efficiency of mono and poly panels.