Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский — Испания)
Español - Latinoamérica (испанский — Латинская Америка)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский — Португалия)
Português-Brasil (португальский — Бразилия)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
And only if you do, in fact, use lithium batteries. Which is far superior to lead-acid, NiCD, or classic NiMH*.
* = Newer NiMH using polyacene anodes may have 2x the density of LFP, but has relatively poor speed of charge/discharge, but ~2x-5x the cyclic life! Properly cared for, even old NiMH can outlast lipo, but LFP usurped the battery market until recently.
Point is, solar panels mostly use silicon, copper, and aluminium and are HIGHLY recycleable, covering Mono and Polycrystalline panels. Flexible amorphous and thin-film use different materials and involve rare earth materials, such as Indium and Gallium, and are NOT recycleable in addition to having half the life expectancy, producing more heavy, and having between 1/2 and 1/3 the efficiency of mono and poly panels.