Store Page
Garry's Mod
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews

Garry's Mod

Store Page
Garry's Mod>  Workshop > Collections > Moka's Workshop > [CW2] Warface Weapons Pack (Full) > Discussions
[CW2] Warface Weapons Pack (Full)
Description Discussions4 Comments165
Cerberus, the Triple Demon 23 Apr, 2019 @ 12:20am
Why made for CW 2.0 and not TFA?
Because TFA is more advanced more customization stuff
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
bdbd 12 Jul, 2019 @ 7:24am 
CW 2.0 best
#1
nothous 18 Jul, 2019 @ 2:11pm 
@LSH no m9k best
#2
Cerberus, the Triple Demon 18 Jul, 2019 @ 2:32pm 
Originally posted by Headcrab:
@LSH no m9k best
I dont Ike M9K
#3
Orion 25 Aug, 2019 @ 10:33am 
TFA is great in that it's generally more popular, you don't need attachment boxes to get the attachments, there are plenty more attachments to get in general. More expansive and cool weapons. AND most of the weapons on TFA are NPC compatible! Unlike CW 2.0
#4
★ MILF lover 14 Sep, 2019 @ 9:33pm 
Cw 2.0 is good but it dont have c_hand,think about it
#5
Darmagon 2 Dec, 2019 @ 1:51pm 
I honestly don't give a damn where the weapons are stored they work the same and are equally cool.
#6
SUPERBUBU 7 Jun, 2020 @ 7:14am 
it's because cw 2.0 is better and TFA lags more (i'm talking from experience here)
#7
BunkerGhust 19 Jun, 2020 @ 5:53am 
With my experience, i find C.W 2.0 to not work for me.
#8
Slav 25 Jul, 2020 @ 10:39am 
Im not love a Cw 2.0..Because have a problems..
Problem 1 : In first person for you saw for you have a scope or somthing like that.And what about use camera? or third person ? so welp..Its not shows a that scope for you used on weapon.
Problem 2 : Its not have C_Hands...(But good have Addon for made a C_Hands..But bad for works ONLY for Addon's Weapons for says like "Ey dude u need to downland this for u want a C_Hands on ya weapons")
#9
BunkerGhust 25 Jul, 2020 @ 4:12pm 
no ArcCW is THE best.
#10
BunkerGhust 24 Mar, 2021 @ 2:31pm 
@dunk & slam I Really REALLY don't like CW 2.0.
#11
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Per page: 1530 50