Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The clones don't personally know the original. They may consider them a friend, but anything beyond shouldn't be the default.
It's like, you've been raised your entire life by your step parents, now they tell you they you were actually this other couple's child. Would you really, by default, associate with them?
Then think about the position that the clone is in. They were brought to the Rimworld and don't know anyone. Their memories, if brought over by use of the brain scanner, is not their own.
They're confused and unsure of what to make of their original, and of fellow clones.
The mod literally creates a mood debuff stating that the clone can make no sense of the situation.
So yes, I don't think that the relationship is that of a parent and child. They don't know the original personally, and they would need to be familiar with them on their own terms.
Of course, there's likely some association due to being a clone. They are associated in literally any way. Anything they do looks like the original and their clones. Of course they will look to have guidance from each other and form a "clonehood".
So there.
We're not talking about genetic relations, we're talking about social relations.
There is NO WAY that a clone is going to just associate themselves with the original right off the bat. They just came into being and they have NO IDEA why, and how; and they know nothing about their originals.
Base the familial relationships off of that.
And besides, my point stands even then that those relationships that they would then 'remember' is not their own, why would they trust someone that they 'know' but never lived with?
How could they trust, or mistrust; anyone, as a newly-minted clone?
This point has been made before:
The other fellow replying to you, however, is asserting that no matter how oblivious the clone may be, he or she is still genetically related to the original and perhaps that should be noted somehow (as right now there's absolutely no note of who, exactly, a clone is derived from, only that they're a "Clone" of someone).
@felinoe initially gave their thought that the clones should think of their original as parents, of a sort. The problem was that parents raise their kids, and the clones are 18 years old out of the vat.
I was never against having a relationship defined to indicate who the original is in the clones' relationship list. The issue with his comments is that they are about biological association, and maybe they weren't clear enough, or maybe they just don't read the rest of the thread; but I interpret them to mean 'social association by default, to the original by the clone.'