That's ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. I hate DE.

You could try doing whatever they did on the Mithras skins but damn, unfortunate

That was also a couple years ago. Rules may have changed.

Originally posted by Crimson Rain:

That was also a couple years ago. Rules may have changed.

it was created a couple years ago, but it was accepted fairly recently

Originally posted by Crimson Rain:

That was also a couple years ago. Rules may have changed.

Rules haven't changed, and I wouldn't expect them to. Transparency is a technical limitation for body models because it exposes the inside of the model, which have no faces. Mirage Mithra was created and submitted a long, long time ago, but only accepted relatively recently as a result of the sections changed to be opaque, as said by the previous user.

As it is, I don't think it's too much of a problem for this skin particularly. It doesn't focus on transparency as much as the Mithra skins do. Very small opacity changes to relevant parts of the bodies and it will probably meet requirements.

Originally posted by yellow:

Originally posted by Crimson Rain:

That was also a couple years ago. Rules may have changed.

Rules haven't changed, and I wouldn't expect them to. Transparency is a technical limitation for body models because it exposes the inside of the model, which have no faces. Mirage Mithra was created and submitted a long, long time ago, but only accepted relatively recently as a result of the sections changed to be opaque, as said by the previous user.

As it is, I don't think it's too much of a problem for this skin particularly. It doesn't focus on transparency as much as the Mithra skins do. Very small opacity changes to relevant parts of the bodies and it will probably meet requirements.

There is not translucency on the body that does not have an in-game equivilent, sure the fabric is currently thick but its flattened out in game so there should not be any issues with the transparency