安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
檢舉此篇文章
There's a focus in the Polish tree called Polish Revanchism. The notable thing it does is reduce the required world tension for generating war goals by 40%. So Poland can pursue conquest to bolster itself much earlier in the game, and remain in its Non-Aligned state.
Non-Aligned is a bit 'poor man's choice' and feels more like waiting to pick a side. So my suggestion is perhaps including in the Non-Aligned path a reduction in the 'generate war goal tension limit'. Poland can generate war goals with 10% world tension. Potentially 15 or 20% might work for generic non-aligned if that seems too soon.
In order to create a time cost to make up for the players not needing to use PP, civil wars or simply waiting for political influence changes, it could be placed near the middle or bottom of the path. So players would have to bee-line for it.