Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I know you do buildings mostly, but here is something I think would be great to see as an adjustment.
I would like to see a year round gatherer's hut.
During the summer and fall it would be at full harvest. This is due to flowers blooming and trees seeding, etc. During the winter it wold be like at half harvest as the gatherers would need to harvest other items like roots or similar. Think like a potato for a potato plant in hibernation. Certain things like fruits, etc. would not be available.
Not sure the difficulty, but thinking something like that.
@The Mysterious Stranger,
Thank you for your feedback, unfortunately making all year round working gatherer hut can't be done without memory lag and impact on base core game code. I wouldn't recommend to create something like this especially when game has performance instability.
Don't know if you notice but many plants have their own requirement to grow (specific temperature) - both those planted by villagers and those in wild. When Winter comes we have so called "no plants temperature" and it's made this way for a reason.
I'm working currently on mod called Greenhouse and this building will give your villagers vegetables and fruits all year round and you will be able to choose between growing veggies and fruits. This will limit also resources used by game so it won't cause game's lags as making GH would. Hope this solution is acceptable by you. Looking forward to your reply! :)
Thank you for the clarification and limitations of this idea. What you propose sounds like a great work around and look forward to this!