Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I found an issue,
Example :
Asteroid
Lab
Base
I scan the Asteroid with the Lab.
Data is send from the Lab to the base.
I give the Asteroid with "note+ Uran" some Informations.
I mine the uranium out of the steroid.
I change the Info from the steroid to "note empty".
Update will Not recived from the base.
I have to delet the laibury in the base, so the fresh Update from the Lab writes the New Information.
so wenn you note a asteroid a few times, with two or more labs, alsways the newsest note will be taken?
that said, i don't see a good solution as removing a GPS point from *all* the Databases on the network sounds like a nightmare to keep track of the changes. also, some grids may want to *keep* that point while the others don't. on the flip side of the coin. distributing out the GPS points is useful when cataloging Jump points, stations, or other miscellanea for a faction. so, there's issues with having them be skipped in replication.
overall i think this is incredibly minor and frankly i doubt it'll even really cause an issue but it might be useful to be aware of.