Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Another intriguing aspect was the fact that we cannot see the underside of this table, which concerning implications: we cannot see the whole picture, we cannot truly know what issues were being discussed at this gianter table. There could be another world of table underneath gianter table, and I think this could be a potential setup for the much anticipated sequel, Giantest Table. Perhaps the creator intentionally made the point that political issues are far too complicated to understand at a cursory glance and that one must be wary of outside, unknown forces pushing their own political agenda.
Although I agree with this statement, I would like to inquire then what agenda you are attempting to push with this artful critque.