Make a "cheat" version just for fun with no PP cost. I guess you could add that to the setup before launching a game. Also make it possible to choose if AI uses it

Going to rewrite the mod to a gui so i could probably make the cheat option for that, AI currently doesnt use it cause if some weirdness with how it handles on map decisions with vars. ill see if i can re implement it on the gui version

Is there a way to make Urban provinces get damaged the more fighting goes on in them? I've always wanted to see a 'Stalingrad effect' on cities when there is a lot of fighting there.

I requested it a long time ago on the Paradox forum. I think it would be really cool if cities started out nice but then get more and more damaged. And eventually turn into rubble. Rubble would give a large defensive bonus and make movement very hard.

Originally posted by Riekopo:

Is there a way to make Urban provinces get damaged the more fighting goes on in them? I've always wanted to see a 'Stalingrad effect' on cities when there is a lot of fighting there.

I requested it a long time ago on the Paradox forum. I think it would be really cool if cities started out nice but then get more and more damaged. And eventually turn into rubble. Rubble would give a large defensive bonus and make movement very hard.

I second this

Make a feature that allow migration to the state, so the population can grow

Hey, I really like the idea of the mod, but it does not feel quite balanced.
The PP cost is okay, but the civ costs are to heavy compared to the overall outcome of a state upgrade. But I could live with that if I used all my building slots and this is the only way to get more.

BUT the biggest downside: you need to be at peace. After 39 you are 100% always at war. And this when you reach the point where all slots are full. like 44/45.

I played Germany in my testrun.

Greetings

I think it would be better if instead of needing to be at peace, you had to be on civ economy or something along those lines, since you're almost always at war at the point where it's worth to sacrifice that many civs for building slots

Originally posted by WhatIsMyLife:

I think it would be better if instead of needing to be at peace, you had to be on civ economy or something along those lines, since you're almost always at war at the point where it's worth to sacrifice that many civs for building slots

As soon as you go to war you go to war eco (like 95% of times). Would result in the same as being at peace. And switching laws to upgrade is way to expensive.

Originally posted by Loki:

Originally posted by WhatIsMyLife:

I think it would be better if instead of needing to be at peace, you had to be on civ economy or something along those lines, since you're almost always at war at the point where it's worth to sacrifice that many civs for building slots

As soon as you go to war you go to war eco (like 95% of times). Would result in the same as being at peace. And switching laws to upgrade is way to expensive.

well it should be extra expensive to industrialize during warfare, but i think aswell it should be possible.
My idea would be to give an extra decision you can take during warfare that allows urbanization, but also gives debuffs on attacking non-core territory.
this way you`d have to decide if you want to keep advancing into enemy territory or buckle up and expand your industry.
or maybe a reduction on millitary production? would be realistic as you would have to divide resources and manpower away, and it would also becomme an actuall decission when to urbanize.
Thought PP always starts to pile up lategame, if you could use that without loosing civ`s it wouldn`t be too expensive i`d say

Add supply hub and railway level as requirements for upgrading to further levels, please.