Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
P. S.
Love your work. :)
The Foreign Policy section in vanilla Democracy 4 really needs more attention.
O that's pretty interesting, I didn't know that. That certainly does make sense in some cases. You should definitely keep the override. :)
The way I see it, the "Military Spending" policy (as the name implies) is a general indicator on how much a nation is willing to spend in resourcing its military as a hole. This would include everything from staff, equipment, facilities, training regimes and of course the amount of professional soldiers (and their pay) etc..
A nation may (for various reasons) find it worth while to enforce mandatory conscription e.g. reducing overall costs by substituting its professional troops with conscripts. However, a nation can reversely supplement its professional forces with conscripts without cutting overall costs in the process i.e. increasing the nations overall "Military Strength".
It is also equally true (tho pretty hilarious) that you could have a nation with the most comprehensive conscription program while not funding the military at all. Essentially recruiting everyone and equipping them with sticks and kettles (instead of helmets) and send them off to the battlefield. This is Democracy 4 after all; you can ban unions while at the same time be subsidizing them. :D
But in short I think you should keep the override in place but also make it so that the policy does also support the "Military Strength" but only to a limited degree. Quantity is a quality in its own right, but only to a certain extent.