Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Sounds interesting, while a bit "unfair" maybe for strong realms like gundabad (which i dont think you can take with a small expedition" if we had some "wilderness" mountains (wilderness being a new mechanic that has now been released in out latest 3.0 patch) we could maybe make something where you could go and to that. while wilderness symbolise areas without a govermental ruler, there are still dangers like spiders, wolves and "dragons" and maybe we'll add more of these types in the future. Which i think would work better with this idea.
I'm not making any promises here but it's a good idea, and nothing is decided yet for 4.0 :)