RimWorld
Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator
 이 토론은 고정되었습니다. 중요해서 그렇겠죠?
Fisherman_56 2021년 8월 29일 오전 10시 59분
To clear some confusion.Diference between different electric generators using nuclear fuel.
When someone think about nuclear power, their first thought is of big towers with radioactive sign on them, mostly. First, this towers have nothing to do with energy generation, they are part of cooling system and they are appropriately named "cooling towers." It is open-cycle cooling system which using evaporation to cool water. It is cheap and maintenance-light if you have reliable water supply and so, it is used on most powerplants that use coal, gas, nuclear reactor or other source of heat.

To actual nuclear generators: there are two types. Theromoelectric and reactors.
Reactors can be fission reactors, which are used on all atomic energy plants today, and fusion reactors, which are theorised but haven't been made yet, as fusion bombs don't count.

Fission reactors utilise power of radioactive nuclear fission, which means that heavy atoms split into lighter atoms, usually emmiting stray electrons, alpha-particles (helium ions) and gamma-radiation. In theory, fission can be induced, but the lighter the atoms, the less energy gain until we reach iron, where further fission will result in energy loss. You can find them in RimAtomics mod.

Fusion reactors utilise power of radioactice nuclear fusion, which means that light atoms split fuse into heavier atoms, usually emitting stray electrons, beta-particles (lone electrons) and gamma-radiation. Again, fusion further than iron results in energy loss, which is why iron is so abudant: it is the most stable element. Fusion of hydrogen and helium is very energy-profitable and clean, but starting fusion reaction require vast amount of energy, which is why gas giants do not spontaneously ignite into new stars. Engineers of whole world are trying to solve this problem, as this will give us a lot of cheap and clean energy.

Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators, or RTGs for short, utilise power of radioactive decay, naturally occuring process in unstable elements, such as uranium or plutonium. They last years without maintenance, but give little power. They are usually used as power sources for autonomous polar bases, deep space probes and as heat source for mars rovers. This mod adds them.
Fisherman_56 님이 마지막으로 수정; 2022년 5월 1일 오전 10시 26분
< >
전체 댓글 2개 중 1~2개 표시 중
Maya 2021년 9월 22일 오후 7시 58분 
There are a few problems with this post, first they are called nuclear fission and nuclear fusion.

There is also that light atoms do not split into heavier ones in fusion, they fuse, over simplified: 2 or more smaller atoms slam together and become a heavier atom, beta particles are electrons, not protons, most helium isnt a good fuel for fusion reactors, the isotope that is a good fuel would be Helium-3, a lighter isotope of helium that is IIRC quite rare on Earth, especially when compared to Helium-4 which is the vast majority of natural helium.

You also cant run fission reactors on most isotopes of most elements, to run a fission reactor you need isotopes of elements that arent too stable but also arent too unstable, or(how most, if not all, reactors are fueled) a mix of specific isotopes.
Fisherman_56 2021년 9월 23일 오전 8시 43분 
Maya 님이 먼저 게시:
There are a few problems with this post, first they are called nuclear fission and nuclear fusion.
Being non-english speaker is hard. Especially when you are struck by an urge in the night.

Maya 님이 먼저 게시:
There is also that light atoms do not split into heavier ones in fusion, they fuse, over simplified: 2 or more smaller atoms slam together and become a heavier atom, beta particles are electrons, not protons, most helium isnt a good fuel for fusion reactors, the isotope that is a good fuel would be Helium-3, a lighter isotope of helium that is IIRC quite rare on Earth, especially when compared to Helium-4 which is the vast majority of natural helium.
This is correct. First: I reused previous paragraph to make post faster, so I missed the verb. Also, I didn't check particle composition, which is why I claimed protons being b-particles while b-particles are electrones(beta-minus-particles) and positrones (beta-plus-particles), which are also charged particles. I purposely left isotopes out as oversimplication, but I see that it allows confusion.

Maya 님이 먼저 게시:
You also cant run fission reactors on most isotopes of most elements, to run a fission reactor you need isotopes of elements that arent too stable but also arent too unstable, or(how most, if not all, reactors are fueled) a mix of specific isotopes.
Ahem. In theory, fission can be induced blah blah blah. In practice, specific isotopes are used because they are cost-effective. Also, this was my attempt to tell why iron is most abudant, I admit that I carried away. So, correct. Thank you for correct my mistakes in the name of enlightening people (or in the name of "Someone is WRONG in the internet", I really don't care as long as it lessens confusion).
< >
전체 댓글 2개 중 1~2개 표시 중
페이지당 표시 개수: 1530 50