Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Even if it were, you're supposed to control the sentry with the Wrangler for a reason... you're the one who's supposed to be accurate.
The idleing (on/off) thing isn't the worst idea I've ever heard, but like it says, this thing is a Cosmedic...
Seriously, you do realize that Sentries are aimbots and CANNOT miss ANY shot, right?
If it had to have secondary effect, maybe it could do new voice commands, like the Engineer REALLY talking to his Sentry when doing specific things, but that's all I could think of for a COSMETIC.
And Primary Slot, so sure if you have the wrangler you can just go ♥♥♥♥ yourself to even get a kill, It's just absurd how every of those taunts/cosmetics have a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ discussion like this one that says: LOL MAKE IT TONTKILL. LOL MAKE IT FOR ALL CLASSES. And even stats for them.
...Oh did I talk about the: AWESOME. LOL VALVE ADD IT AND GIMME ONE LOL.
u know they can't hit scout when he has bonk on right so sentries can't kill everything so u got that wrong
15% more damage by your sentry
15% less damage by your shotgun
He didn't say they can kill everything. He said they can't miss... If this made the sentry able to kill scouts with the "Bonk!" effect, then why not make able to kill ubercharged enemies? This is ridiculous. It's a cosmetic, not a weapon. Everyone here is proposing stats that, even if it was a weapon, are absurd. I do think it should add the new voice commands DJvamp(sad) suggested, but there is nothing else of ANY value, in this discussion. Nothing should even be considered in this discussion with the exception of what DJvamp(sad) suggested. DJvamp(sad) has suggested something that is not that valuable, yet more valuable than anything else in this discussion.