Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
One dumb way I can think working around the 100% limit (1% loss an hour) problem, would be to keep a reference of connected generators and add 1% condition every x.x hours or whatever metric you want to use, to counteract the "loss" if you will. I assume that in theory, it would be a hacky way of implementing a "condition loss override" adjustment so that generators degrade slower.
In theory, if you set it to recover 1% every 2.0 hours, the generator would last about 2x as long, depending on how the timer would work. Ideally each generator would have its own condition managed as an instance, and the timer would be retained between loading a game/server world, but even a global timer should do well enough, as long as the timer is tracked and does not reset.
The closer to 1.0 you go, the longer the generator would last before needing repairs. if it were set to 100.0 hours, it would in effect disable any modification, though I don't see much point in allowing extreme values, then just disable the mod at that point xD
Main issue with that approach is how significant even a small change in values will have on the effect with this approach, making it a bit hard to estimate how long a generator will actually last.