Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Could you clarify what you mean by "replacing" an apparel item? Pointing me in the direction of a specific mod that does this would also help me test more easily.
Im not sure if its limited to just patches loaded by a LoadFolder. But it seems replacing a ThingDef for an apparel in any form, as long as its the whole def, causes the error. I eventually changed the patch to change individual parts. The issue with that though is that rimworld has an issue currently where if you want to change the Parent of a def using PatchOperationAttributeSet the inheritance doesnt work, unless you replace the whole def. (wierd bug).
Im not sure if that inheritance bug was the cause of another mod. But either way, it seems the graphical reference for ThingDefs is lost when this happens, causing paper pattern to throw this error and all apparel on that pawn being invisible for that pawn if wearing an apparel that was replaced by a patch.
If you do decide to test without the overrider active, let me know how it goes.
Definitely should consider reporting your issue in the dev Discord.
I'll put investigating this on my to-do list, but it could be a while before I get to it, I'm afraid.