Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- By setting the Seize land option, each 5 years it will take down one stack of 20% on every province of the state selected, and rise 0.25 corruption for every province affected;
- It will also deteriorate the estate's relation with you, depending which one is being affected (Burghers is 0% most of the time with me due to my constant appropriation of lands);
- By taking land to the State, you will have a bigger hold on the province administration, but will raise current governance, and give administrative debuffs if too high;
- It is possible to remove the unrest debuff after the desired percentage has reached in the provinces. It will eventually remove itself with time, but I found to be more adviseable to remove it manually.
I think this summarizes it. Knowing more of this, I enjoyed much more the administration game, and I noticed the bureaucratic setbacks in expanding ever so blindly, mainly in a Byzantium campaign.