Steam-fællesskab :: Slate

Butiksside

Counter-Strike 2

Alt Diskussioner Skærmbilleder Illustrationer Broadcasts Videoer Værksted Nyheder Guider Anmeldelser

Counter-Strike 2 > Værksted > laerths værksted > Slate > Diskussioner

Slate

Beskrivelse Diskussioner8 Kommentarer329 Ændringsbemærkninger

Vil du gerne deltage i diskussionen? Du skal logge ind eller oprette en konto.

Dato opslået: 2. apr. 2016 kl. 11:20

Indlæg: 15

Start en ny diskussion

Diskussionsregler og retningslinjer

Flere diskussioner

List Servers Here:

Insane Map Design

OP Jump on B-Ramp

Как вам карта?

ace hardware har Counter-Strike 2

2. apr. 2016 kl. 11:20

Problems. Many, many problems.

First off, are the floors entirely made of brushes? They lag me out and they're are way too detailed. The skyscrapers in the skybox look too crazy for the map to be in an operation, and everything is too clean. The spawnpoints look like they should be escapable. So, that's enough about the visuals. Each site has way too many defensive positions, like 8 for only A site alone, and only two entrances. B has this massive sniper sided view that leads almost all the way from site to T spawn. Visibily isn't very good either, every corner I turn I feel like there are 20 possible spots the enemy could be. :/

< >

Viser 1-15 af 15 kommentarer

Big

2. apr. 2016 kl. 14:30

And this is why CS maps are made to play well, and not look amazing. Even maps that look great, like Nuke, are still based heavily on brush work and clean, smooth colours.

Lefty

2. apr. 2016 kl. 19:46

Map looks great but, it feels like a 3 lane cod map.

ace hardware har Counter-Strike 2

3. apr. 2016 kl. 5:17

I think I've created a big complaining thread. Oh my.

Insto

3. apr. 2016 kl. 8:13

spooks'

3. apr. 2016 kl. 11:05

i dont have any problems, maybe you should just upgrade your pc, maybe it isnt meant for bad pcs at all or maybe you just shouldnt write something like that at all when youre the only one with problems

ace hardware har Counter-Strike 2

3. apr. 2016 kl. 12:02

@Patrock, that's not the point. They're distracting. And maps aren't "meant for good pcs". They should all be able to run well.

RestlessBug har Counter-Strike 2

3. apr. 2016 kl. 16:43

Oprindeligt skrevet af Goatacus:
@Patrock, that's not the point. They're distracting. And maps aren't "meant for good pcs". They should all be able to run well.

Thats a very good point. The creators of cs go wanted it to be a game that everyone can play and when you have maps like these that most likely everyone will want to play. People with low power pcs wont be able to even get a chance to play the game.

halvt sexuell har Counter-Strike 2

4. apr. 2016 kl. 4:15

Hey guys, I'm a complete ♥♥♥♥♥♥

de_rank Ac1d9urk4l har Counter-Strike 2

4. apr. 2016 kl. 12:02

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zero with a belt on:
And this is why CS maps are made to play well, and not look amazing. Even maps that look great, like Nuke, are still based heavily on brush work and clean, smooth colours.

youre absolutely right, but new nuke is the map with the most probs and little brushwork. just saying.

ace hardware har Counter-Strike 2

4. apr. 2016 kl. 12:05

Oprindeligt skrevet af ~ HaWaRa:
youre absolutely right, but new nuke is the map with the most probs and little brushwork. just saying.

The majority of what is important to gameplay is brush though.

#10

typical

5. apr. 2016 kl. 0:17

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zero with a belt on:
And this is why CS maps are made to play well, and not look amazing. Even maps that look great, like Nuke, are still based heavily on brush work and clean, smooth colours.

but remember how all the first 1.6 maps looked like ♥♥♥♥ and played like ♥♥♥♥?

#11

nausicc

5. apr. 2016 kl. 4:57

In my opinion, the map is good, it looks really nice. BUT there are too many corners where people can hide, when you check one corner you can be seen from another corner and it becomes hard to play on a 5v5 match or a 10v10

#12