Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks so much for the observation and comment.
ENABLE_ATMOSPHERIC_ENTRYEFFECT = false
If you really add visual effects, Keen might beat you to it. Just something I thought you might want to know.
The mustang P-51 repllica only made it to a top speed of 300 mk\h - 186mph.
a real Mustang will top speed at 400mph
The B-25j Mitchell replica toped out at 100m\s -223mph
a reall B-25j will top speed at 272 mph
Granite the power to weight ratio is going to be a little scewed due to the 1 size engine I have to use. Also I dont know if you have less drag on angled blocks or if it consideres all block the same amount of drag.
Also I dont think you mentioned anything on the angle of the block or if that is possible to accommodate for. Anyway just wondering, It would be kool if aerodynamics made a difference instead of just for aesthetics.
(side note) I was doing more tests with top speed and whatnot. Since most of my planes use landing gear or rotors and have multiple grids I did a few test flights where I detached all other grids and had the same results as before.