Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
First of all, i think you should do an equal AI-Human but with increasing the agressivity of the AI, like in the vanilla hard mode
I personally dislike the AI get more money, recruitment slots and settlement/horde growth,
I have personally played an campain with a bunch of mod who together canceled nearly all the AI advantage and with the hard difficulty + the always colonise mod, it looked way more hard than in the vanilla hard because they were just pro-active all around the map, not standing and derping.
And could you reduce a lot the AI being focused on agent? like dont cancel them but just reduce so they just sometimes got 1-2 agents, who sometimes do some agressive actions, not always ;)
Last point : "not be affected by Treacheries" What does it means exactly?
I personally would love this mod being like that
- go more often to War
- colonise more often
- not be affected by Treacheries (IDK WHAT DOES IT MEANS HEHE)
- spend more Money
- spend its Money more for Armies and Buildings
- do more Diplomacy
- occupy more
- use better Armies (Army Compositions from Radious)
- act better on the Campaign Map (Attacking, Defending. Retreating)
- act better regarding Sallyout while Sieges
- more sack then Raze
- Removing of nonsense, artifical Difficulties (for Example equal Public Order for Player and the AI, no-Attrition for the AI)
-Reduce AI Agressive actions with agents
without any advantage for the AI
Thanks for reading me and keep going, love your work ♥
Regarding Cheats and more Money:
As i wrote, the AI has no Cheats on Easy!
The harder Personalities only gank up more on the Player and have different Budget Personalities.
They are more Anti-Player and Anti Great Power, but that is already evened out in my Mod, as all have the same Spending, and Great Power Policy.
Also they dont gank up more on the Player, they are even.
So there is no Point, other than the Cheats, playing on higher Difficulties with my Mod.
Factions get Treacheries Penalty for breaking Diplomacy Treaties with other Factions.
This means for some Turns, EVERY Faction in the World will be harder to talk and trade with, just because you declared War on someone, who they maybe even dont know ( eg. you break Treatment with Vampire Counts, every AI Faction will distrust you for some Time).
This is something i am working on, as the many Heroes are very annoying after some Time...
Yes.
Difficulty only defines Cheats in my Mod.
-Home Region movement bonus
-Double skill points
Also I am guessing that this mod already includes the "No public order from difficulty"?
Yes, included.
Beware that Hard will be hard as Legendary and AI will have more Armies and good Troops.
I am on Turn 150 in my Dwarfen Campaign on Hard and Man...its Good vs Evil.
Allied Confederated Empire and Bretonia Factions are on March together towards the Chaos Hordes, with 15 Armies.
But Chaos comes again and again...
:D
Maybe Chaos needs more Armies, i will see!
https://www.twitch.tv/bhi36/v/69441556
The Barak Varr only keep sacking the settlement rather than capturing it. Even though the settlement is in their own province. The second part is without your mod.
But looking over it, i found something very important out, thanks for the Hint!
Will update it asap
Thats not how the AI Occupation System works.
Its just Numbers and the higher the Number the more likely the specific Occupation happens.
However, many Tables still make Problems with the Packfilemanager and i had to use the Assembly Kit.
So i dont know if it works then as intended...