Thanks for your feedback... but have you ever seen water flow uphill? ;)

I think he means because the two log rides would collide into each other..

Both wouldn't be a problem. The Actual waterway in which the logs move isn't closed off, meaning that it wouldn't overflow if water was coming from both sides, and the logs would go down on one side and get pulled up on the other. Fully playable.

This is the most irrelevant critique for playability I have ever seen. It's not even part of the playground xD

We could have boats for the CTs and then T can take the rollercoaster and then they switch halftime, yes cool idea, damn i'm so good!

BubkeZ 님이 먼저 게시:

Thanks for your feedback... but have you ever seen water flow uphill? ;)

Good usage of recycability. ;D

BubkeZ 님이 먼저 게시:

Thanks for your feedback... but have you ever seen water flow uphill? ;)

If we could actually move water uphill without inputting extra force(or doing work), we could produce unlimited electricity, resulting in significant lowering of prices of electricity and thus making water generated electricity a household thing, which will lead to lowering of other products that use water in some way in the form of electric energy and thus it will result in many people losing their jobs and thus the government will launch implausible raids on houses which have personal dams, thus creating a collision between the evil minded CTs and the free leading group of T(the actual heroes in this scenario).Ok enough.Now I gotta go for dinner.Thank me for the bedtime story, okay? :C

the water still flow downhill, only a moving 'band or how u can call it xD"" goes upwards, the water still flows downhill xDD

As a RCT player i see where he comes from but ye its a minor.