Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks. :D
Now that you point it out, yeah I think reworking AT would probably be beneficial. The problem is i'm not exactly sure how that'd work though. As it stands any AT weapon would have to do insane ammounts of damage in order to take down any of our vehicles, making it far superior to any weapon we currently have. (Well - I suppose this happens anyway so we may just live with it.)
Although, I can see this happening if we added a seperate damage system to armored vehicles making them immune to all forms of damage except for Anti-Tank weapons, which would take them down quickly... Hmm...
Well, thanks for your suggestion - i'll keep this in mind when talking to Magic.