Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I'm currently working on Poly, with the big question being how to control whose bed a colonist ends up in!
I'm not entirely convinced by sex repulsed, but I am interested in low libido colonists, with additional checks on lovin' that lead to debuffs even when IN relationships, but you can still get the +4-10 for the good opinion of your partner.
does something like this exists already? I'd be happy to help develop it - but just the design not the coding, unfortunately...
being more on-topic: sex repulsed isn't already represented somehow by the asexual trait?
I think here there's a huge expending potential - first things popping up are masochists getting hurt and possibly needing medical attention but getting also a rebuff when they're sadist partner 'loves' them.
and also: differentiation between ale and female clothing ;-) and all the possibilities this opens up.
- Awesome! :)
Concerning the bed question, we tend to build bigger beds. ;)
There's also a lot of asexual people in polyamorous unions, since asexual doesn't neccessary mean aromantic...
"Free Spirit" or something, I'm sure there is a more precise term. A pawn with this trait will only ever have casual sex. They will either never, or be highly unlikely to enter into a serious relationship.
"Turn Down Pro" Prevents a pawn from getting the "I can't get a moment's peace" mood malus, which I believe results from having to rebuff too many times in a given day.
In case you were wondering where I was going with this: I once misread the description of the Courtesan background to mean they would have some sort of special social interaction options. At this point I'm pretty sure they don't, but but traits like these might allow something along those lines.
Pansexual - the coding would be the same as Bi with just the name changed, but it'd be really cool to have it in there
Aromantic - will have hookups and lovers (maybe?) but not relationships
Demisexual - has to have a really high friendship with someone b4 having hook ups/lovers/engaged/etc
these are obviously incredibly simplified versions of these much more nuanced identities but. I'll take what I can get!