Okay so first off i noticed a few things a 'few' things with your weapons in this pack... (keep in mind 'few' is a understatement)

screenshots:
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/id/gscales332/screenshot/105102475142114877
1/2 for this display
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=807125565
2/2 for this display
the bipod is ALL WRONG, its a HARRIS bipod, you couldve atleast taken the g3-a3/sg-1 bipod and stuck it on there but you had to do the HARRIS bipod... im sorry but thats just wrong... but theres is unfortunately more...

https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=807125615
this screenshots caption couldnt be ANYMORE self explamatory to you. basiclly i think you ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up a bit of coding on that extended magazine when someone would bullet chamber with the extended magazine attatchment on the mp-443

https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=807125659
the suppressor could be more... accurate... i mean just put a tundra 9mm on there and you're good. A cobra m2 is for .45 acp ammunition NOT 9mm parabellum mostly in terms of realism and caliber types with the correct surppressors.

part 2 continued due to saving space... please hold your questions and answers till im done.

part 2 of critique.

https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=807125594 1/2
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=807125678 2/2

as you can see there yea its mostly saying your choice of attatchment is... bad. :/ However it can be a BIT better if you just stick the g3-a3/sg-1 bipod on there instead to make a more 'makeshift rpk bipod' look more 'fitting' but since you cant really FIND a REAL rpk bipod by itself and then make it a attatchment for the rpk-74 in this pack then the g3-a3/sg-1 bipod is your best bet you have should you decide to change that after this.

https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=807140001
those stats are just... unheard of. Ugh..! Also keep in mind of that pso-1 scope i have on there and the firerate and recoil for the base stats, i could fire in FULL AUTO WITH THAT SCOPE and the recoil is SO LITTLE EVEN WITH MAGNUM LOADS, that i would have a sniping automatic rifle and the rpk or rpk-74 isnt MEANT to be one of those... it has better firerate and recoil that than that! even with the bipod!

also lastly is just a visual thing:
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=807139967
look at the top of the rear reciever of the gun... its glossy, and thats probably either a. the maps fault (I doubt it though it wasnt like that for every gun that has some sort of shine to it i took out several other sweps and they were not as glossy as that) or b. you ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up the shaders on the gun. And keep in mind before you say anything i had NO shader filters on gmod running no bloom no nothing to preserve frames and ♥♥♥♥ because optimizing this game is a NIGHTMARE.

this concludes my 'critique' of your weapons i only really had to do the rpk but i did see a bit of sloppyness on the 'pkp' with the sight attatchments. (which is wrong btw its a pkm just fyi)

overal rating? c'mon i think you know by now what the rating would based on my 'blunt but truthful' review of these sweps. incase you dont or i need to 'humor you' its 3/10 there was very little effort put into this but they work regardless.

@Duke The Dragon.

Thank you for the taking the time to review my pack that I don't put a lot of effort in but still manage to get the love from most (notice how I use the word "most") of the people.

1st. I did not touch any of the materials for any of the weapons. That glossiness was already there in the materials for the RPK-74 and I am not going to edit any of the materials for ANY of the guns unless someone is actively dying.

2nd. All the attachments I use for any of the weapons in these packs is using the basic attachments and throwing them on the weapons. If I really wanted to utilize my laziness, there would be no attachments whatsoever on any of these weapons and this would just be a better M9K base.

3rd. I am not going to take more time out of the 6 days that I off and on worked on this pack to make sure the bipod on the RPK-74 is a little bit more up to par with your standard of realism. So basically deal with the Harris bipod and also, go ♥♥♥♥ yourself. Trying to make me do more work on my weapons? Jesus Christ.

4th. I will actually take some of the criticism to heart and changing a couple things in the pack, such as slightly modifying stats for the RPK-74, trying to fix the extended magazine for the MP443 which for some reason isn't working correctly, switching the model to a tundra 9mm for the suppressor on the MP443 in terms of "realism", changing the name of the PKP to PKM, or basically the minor things for everything in the pack.

5th. If you plan on criticizing any of my weapons that I take no time on copy and pasting code to make a SWEP, please make sure your grammar is at least equivalent to someone who's 2nd language is English. I r gud at l3et spe3k I swear.

so basically dragon dildo over here is a triggered weapons expert that cant fit anymore dragon dildos in his ass

Originally posted by King Gay:

so basically dragon dildo over here is a triggered weapons expert that cant fit anymore dragon dildos in his ass

seems your triggered yourself if your cursing alot thus censoring yourself to make yourself incoherent to understand.

what are you ♥♥♥♥♥♥ gay

Originally posted by Duke The Dragon:

Originally posted by King Gay:

so basically dragon dildo over here is a triggered weapons expert that cant fit anymore dragon dildos in his ass

seems your triggered yourself if your cursing alot thus censoring yourself to make yourself incoherent to understand. :tw2dragon::cigar:

Actually, the discussions tab censors out no-no words. Here is an example " basiclly i think you ♥♥♥♥ed up a bit of coding on that extended magazine"

Originally posted by King Gay:

what are you ♥♥♥♥♥♥ gay

actually yes i am irl, what of it meme ♥♥♥?

Originally posted by Duke The Dragon:

Originally posted by King Gay:

what are you ♥♥♥♥♥♥ gay

actually yes i am irl, what of it meme ♥♥♥?

lol kill yourself kekekekekekekekekeekkeekekekekek

Originally posted by Soma:

Originally posted by Duke The Dragon:

seems your triggered yourself if your cursing alot thus censoring yourself to make yourself incoherent to understand.

Actually, the discussions tab censors out no-no words. Here is an example " basiclly i think you ♥♥♥♥ed up a bit of coding on that extended magazine"

no ♥♥♥♥ sherlock ya think?

this whole thread shows proof that you people cant take critique properly when blunt or not even if its honest to the very end. Nor does it meet the whole standards of cw 2.0 sweps saying: 'quality over quantity'

Originally posted by King Gay:

Originally posted by Duke The Dragon:

actually yes i am irl, what of it meme ♥♥♥?

lol kill yourself kekekekekekekekekeekkeekekekekek

lol so original heres a witty responce: do it yourself if your so tough behind a computer screen